Sign up for the daily Inside Washington email for exclusive US coverage and analysis sent to your inbox Get our free Inside Washington email
Please enter a valid email address
Please enter a valid email address
SIGN UP
I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy notice
Thanks for signing up to the
Inside Washington email
{{ #verifyErrors }} {{ message }} {{ /verifyErrors }} {{ ^verifyErrors }} Something went wrong. Please try again later {{ /verifyErrors }}
Republican megadonor Harlan Crow and conservative activist Leonard Leo have been subpoenaed by the Senate Judiciary Committee to comply with their investigation into the ethics of the Supreme Court after months of allegations that justices failed to disclose their substantial financial ties.
On Thursday, 11 Democrats, led by Chairman Dick Durbin, voted in favour of issuing the subpoenas after a contentious hearing resulted in nearly all of the Republican members walking out.
Before the vote, committee members bickered about the matter, with Republicans accusing their Democratic colleagues of trying to undermine the court for political gain.
Republicans had managed to delay the committee’s initial voting schedule by introducing 177 amendments, but during Thursday’s meeting, Mr Durbin announced he would not allow votes on the amendments.
Mr Durbin said the subpoenas are being issued because the two wealthy businessmen and donors “stonewalled” or refused to comply with the Committee’s requests as they investigate the ethics of justices.
RECOMMENDED
Ukraine repelling Russian attacks across six fronts as Zelensky seeks fortifications
Undo
Trump hits out at judge’s wife as fraud trial gag order reinstated: Live
Undo
エベレイズヘルス
年収2000万円を目指す新ヘルスコーチビジネス日本上陆エベレイズヘルス| Sponsored Sponsored
Undo
北の快适工房
楽天1位!爪杀菌ジェル│「正直、谛めてました」でも、使ってビックリ北の快适工房| Sponsored Sponsored
Undo
Powered by Taboola Powered by Taboola
Over the last year, investigative reports from ProPublica shed light on the alleged lavish gifts and luxury trips that justices accepted but failed to disclose to the public while ruling on critical issues.
Promoted stories
空き家 | 検索広告
大坂市: ほぼ无料で贩売中の廃屋(価格を参照)空き家 | 検索広告 今すぐ検索
Undo
by Taboola by Taboola
Sponsored Links Sponsored Links
Promoted Links Promoted Links
Justice Clarence Thomas allegedly accepted extravagant vacations, tuition for a family member and an unusual real estate deal regarding his mother’s home from Mr Crow.
The ties between the two have raised concerns about Justice Thomas’ role in deciding on policy-changing cases.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
" srcset="https://static.independent.co.uk/2023/04/07/17/72406ea1d1894d4b8b12e6534d001875.jpg?quality=75&width=320&auto=webp 320w, https://static.independent.co.uk/2023/04/07/17/72406ea1d1894d4b8b12e6534d001875.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp 640w" src="https://static.independent.co.uk/2023/04/07/17/72406ea1d1894d4b8b12e6534d001875.jpg" data-gallery-length="2" class="i-amphtml-fill-content i-amphtml-replaced-content">
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
(AP)
Similarly, Justice Samuel Alito has been accused of failing to recuse himself from a case before the court this term because one of the lawyers in the case recently interviewed Justice Alito in an article for The Wall Street Journal.
Initially, the committee had sought to subpoena Robin Arkley II too but decided to drop the plan earlier this month after the conservative donor “provided information responsive to the Committee’s requests”.
Unlike any other federal position, justices are appointed for life and, until this month, did not have a public code of conduct.
Several members of Congress, mainly Democrats, and the public called for a formal ethics reform of the Court in the wake of allegations. Mr Durbin said the investigation and subpoenas were a direct consequence of “the Supreme Court’s failure” to investigate its justices and craft an ethics policy.
Though the court issued a formal ethics policy earlier this month, it has been subject to criticism because it does not contain a means of enforcement.
Mr Durbin said on Thursday that he does not seek the subpoena authorisation “lightly” but that it was needed “to protect Congress’s authority and advance the committee’s efforts to implement an enforceable code of conduct for the Supreme Court.”
The tense meeting ended in firey exchanges after Mr Durbin’s refused to recognise his Republican colleagues to speak during the judicial nomination portion of the meeting.
Texas Senator John Cornyn accused Mr Durbin of “destroying the United States Senate Judiciary Committee.”
More about Supreme Court Senate Judiciary Committee Subpoenas Clarence Thomas Dick Durbin
Join our commenting forum Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments
1/ 2Senate Judiciary authorises subpoenas in Supreme Court ethics probe
Senate Judiciary authorises subpoenas in Supreme Court ethics probe
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
AP
Senate Judiciary authorises subpoenas in Supreme Court ethics probe
Congress Supreme Court Ethics
Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Promoted stories
BuzzDaily Winners
40歳以下の场合は、このゲームはプレイしないでください。BuzzDaily Winners| Sponsored Sponsored
今すぐインストール
Undo
Yahoo!不动産
「実家の価値が判明」住所入力するだけでOKYahoo!不动産| Sponsored Sponsored
Undo
RAID: Shadow Legends
大坂市: 40歳未満はこのゲームにご用心RAID: Shadow Legends| Sponsored Sponsored
ゲームをプレイ
Undo
Read More Comments
Collapse Comments
? Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Subscribe
Already subscribed? Log in