(CNN)Newly released Commerce Department documents show "efforts of senior Commerce officials to monitor and potentially interfere in Census Bureau" decisions, according to the groups who successfully sued the Trump administration over the citizenship question.
The groups are suing the Trump administration over the decision to ask whether the person responding to the Census is a US citizen, which critics believe would depress the response rate to the survey. President Donald Trump and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross announced the question would not be asked on this year's Census after the Supreme Court ruled against the administration.
The 1,400 documents were not handed over prior to the trial, and the groups that sued the federal government, including New York State, say that harmed their case. Those groups also say omissions remain.
Read the documents
As CNN reported in January, the trial judge who oversaw the case ordered the Commerce Department to turn over the documents while he considers a request by the plaintiffs to sanction the government over its handling of the case.
close dialog
Sign up for CNN's
Meanwhile In America
A daily analysis of US politics for global readers.
Sign Me Up
No Thanks
By subscribing, you agree to our
privacy policy.
Sign up for CNN's
Meanwhile In America
A daily analysis of US politics for global readers.
Please enter above
Sign Me Up
No Thanks
By subscribing, you agree to our
privacy policy.
You're on the list for CNN's
Meanwhile In America
A daily analysis of US politics for global readers.
close dialog
The government has claimed a technical issue led to the pages being withheld, but the plaintiffs argued the damning nature and the sheer size of the release -- combined with multiple government statements that it had handed everything over -- "speaks to their candor."
The government has not yet responded to the filing.
The release reveals that an aide to Ross asked Census Bureau leadership for feedback on his plan to add the citizenship question on the same day he issued his final decision that it be added.
But how Census Bureau officials responded remains unknown. The Commerce Department did not hand over the actual document, the plaintiffs said, and only handed over an email revealing the document exists.
Census Bureau leadership had tried earlier to dissuade Ross from adding the question, arguing its inclusion would drive down the quality of the count and cost more money.
"Plaintiffs did not know that such documents existed until the post-litigation production," they wrote in the letter to the judge. "During discovery, Defendants led Plaintiffs to believe that the Census Bureau comments on the draft no longer existed or were never memorialized in writing."
The timestamp on that email "raises questions as to whether Commerce actually accounted for and addressed the Census Bureau's views." Census officials responded to the document in the evening, within hours of receiving it, and Ross' final memo was officially dated the same day.
"The concealment of these documents made Plaintiffs' litigation and trial presentation more difficult," the groups wrote.
The government has claimed a technical issue led to the pages being withheld, but the plaintiffs argued the damning nature and the sheer size of the release -- combined with multiple government statements that it had handed everything over -- "speaks to their candor."
The government has not yet responded to the filing.
The release reveals that an aide to Ross asked Census Bureau leadership for feedback on his plan to add the citizenship question on the same day he issued his final decision that it be added.
But how Census Bureau officials responded remains unknown. The Commerce Department did not hand over the actual document, the plaintiffs said, and only handed over an email revealing the document exists.
Census Bureau leadership had tried earlier to dissuade Ross from adding the question, arguing its inclusion would drive down the quality of the count and cost more money.
"Plaintiffs did not know that such documents existed until the post-litigation production," they wrote in the letter to the judge. "During discovery, Defendants led Plaintiffs to believe that the Census Bureau comments on the draft no longer existed or were never memorialized in writing."
The timestamp on that email "raises questions as to whether Commerce actually accounted for and addressed the Census Bureau's views." Census officials responded to the document in the evening, within hours of receiving it, and Ross' final memo was officially dated the same day.
"The concealment of these documents made Plaintiffs' litigation and trial presentation more difficult," the groups wrote.