HONG KONG - On Dec 19, the seventh Hong Kong Legislative Council (LegCo) elections since the handover of Hong Kong will be held. However, the enthusiastic and extensive campaigning for votes by various political parties before is nowhere to be seen, unlike in previous elections.
On a recent Sunday (Nov 28), many candidates vying for seats in the Hong Kong Island East geographical constituency set up street booths to canvass voters.
Amongst them was Mr Stanley Ng Chau-pei from the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions whose booths were bedecked with campaign flags.
Dividing his time between the various booths, he waved and smiled at residents along the way before asking after them, hoping to win them over with his sincerity.
This journalist observed that the locals' reactions were lukewarm and they even went out of their way to avoid Mr Ng's booths.
Petitions for quarantine-free travel to resume between Hong Kong and the mainland as soon as possible were also set up at many of these booths, but there were few signatories.
As the first LegCo election after China's National People's Congress amended the electoral system in Hong Kong, this election is very different from its predecessors.
Under the new electoral system, the total number of seats in the LegCo has been raised from 70 to 90, but much fewer seats are now allocated to the geographical constituency direct election.
In the 2016 LegCo election, the five geographical constituencies produced 35 lawmakers on a proportional representation basis.
For the upcoming election, the number of geographical constituencies has been increased from five to ten, with each constituency returning two members, making up a total of 20 lawmakers.
In addition, the upcoming LegCo election also has a new nomination mechanism. On top of fulfilling the nomination requirements for the geographical or functional constituencies they are running for, candidates also have to be nominated by ten members of the some 1,480-strong Election Committee, minimally two from each of the five sectors in the Election Committee.
With the number of seats available for direct election to the new LegCo reduced drastically and nomination made more arduous, pro-democracy parties such as the Democratic Party, the Civic Party, and the Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood made it clear earlier that they would not be taking part in the upcoming election, the first time they have failed to do so in recent decades.
Mr Lo Kin Hei, chairman of the Democratic Party, the largest in the pan-democracy camp, said that his party will continue with their groundwork and hope that party members will "stay behind the party on this difficult journey".
154 nominations received for 90 LegCo seats
Pedestrians walking past election posters in Hong Kong, on Dec 14, 2021.PHOTO: EPA-EFE
Nonetheless, after nomination ended, the Registration and Electoral Office announced that 154 nominations were received for the 90 LegCo seats available this time round. Amongst them, 13 (around 8 per cent of all nominations) were submitted by those who are non-pro-establishment.
They include centrist candidates from parties such as the Path of Democracy and the Third Side, as well as Ms Mandy Tam Heung-man, formerly of the People Power party.
They are moderate democrats who advocate dialogue with the central government in Beijing.
In the last two years or so, the political landscape in Hong Kong has been revamped. In the absence of pro-democracy and localist parties, observers will also be keenly watching the willingness of locals to vote in the upcoming election.
On Nov 23, the Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute published its findings from a survey it conducted. Only 52 per cent indicated that they would vote in the upcoming election, a massive drop of 31 per cent when compared to the findings of a similar survey carried out before the previous LegCo election five years ago, and the lowest figure since 1991.
A taxi drives past campaign banners for candidate Stanley Ng Chau-pei, in Hong Kong on Nov 28, 2021. PHOTO: AFP
Some 60 per cent did not know the candidates running in their constituencies, while quite a number of respondents indicated they did not know which constituency they belong to. More than 30 per centsaid they are highly unlikely to or have decided not to vote, while another 10 per cent have not decided.
In a recent newspaper article, Mr Cheung Chi Kong, executive director of the One Country Two Systems Research Institute, opined that turnout for the geographical constituency direct election this time round is likely to be just over 20 per cent, a stark contrast to the most recent local elections which took place in the midst of the 2019 Hong Kong protests with turnout in excess of 70 per cent.
Academic Benson Wong Wai Kwok also predicted that the turnout for the LegCo election will not exceed 30 per cent
Related Story
HK leader Carrie Lam urges voters to cast ballots for Dec 19 Legco election
Related Story
Overseas Hong Kong activists urge boycott of 'patriots-only' polls
A third way?
In reality, the (third) path away from pro-establishment and pro-democracy has always been a tough one to trudge in Hong Kong. In the last few years, Mr Ronny Tong Ka-wah who resigned from his LegCo seat and withdrew from the Civic Party in 2015, has been trying to promote his think tank, the Path of Democracy, which is taking a centrist and elitist third path.
However, the Path of Democracy only garnered 18,000 votes in the 2016 LegCo election, less than 1 per cent of the total votes cast.
In the upcoming election, for the first time ever, the Path of Democracy has chosen to cooperate with the Third Side party, which also advocates taking the third path, in a bid to form a coalition with factions that are not pro-establishment in order to maximise their chances of winning.
Mr Tong who is the convener of the Path of Democracy, is of the opinion that there are many rational and moderate voters in Hong Kong who are more centrist with their democratic ideals, and the third path will appeal to this group.
Ms Judy Tzeng Li-wen who is the former secretary-general of the radical localist party People Power, is running for a seat in the New Territories North geographical constituency.
She has shunned political issues in her campaigning, choosing to focus instead on fighting the outsized influence of real estate tycoons; greater oversight to curb collusion amongst government officials, businessmen, and indigenous inhabitants, and wastage of public funds; and monitoring white elephant government projects in the constituency.
When interviewed by Zaobao, Ms Tzeng indicated that she hoped to be given a chance to oversee the Hong Kong government as a LegCo member on behalf of moderate, rational, and independent non-pro-establishment constituents.
She would also continue to advocate for greater democracy in Hong Kong if elected.
Former LegCo member, Frederick Fung Kin-kee, is a key figure of the moderate democratic parties.
After leaving the Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood in 2018, he has failed in two elections, but is still participating this time round.
Candidate Frederick Fung speaking during a rally in Sham Shui Po on Dec 11, 2021. PHOTO: FREDERICK FUNG/FACEBOOK
When interviewed by Zaobao, he criticised the pro-establishment camp for siding with the chief executive on many occasions, providing her with support regardless of the policy.
He hopes to provide voters with an alternative choice through his participation.
Mr Fung emphasised that the pursuit of democracy has always been his political ideal. He also included dual universal suffrage in his manifesto.
Nevertheless, Mr Fung acknowledged that it would be challenging for him to win over the supporters of the traditional democratic parties.
Mr Fung said: "When I am out campaigning on the streets, I sometimes run into criticisms from some supporters of democratic parties. There were even those who continued scolding me even as I walked away, accusing me of being pro-Beijing."
Related Story
Hong Kong 2.0: What might come in the new era for the city
Related Story
Timeline of key events in Hong Kong over past two decades
Less oversight of government?
Quite a few locals worry about the new political structure in Hong Kong. They feel that it is highly likely that the LegCo will be filled with pro-establishment members in future.
To them, if the LegCo did not have legislators that Hong Kongers support, then its role of supervising the government would be diminished.
In an interview with the local media, Mr Ivan Choy Chi-keung, a senior lecturer at the Government and Public Administration department of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, shared data on the speed at which the current LegCo passed recent bills as an example.
The data showed that presently, only 2.5 hours on average was spent debating a bill before it is passed because the absence of pan democrats means that pointed exchanges between the pro-establishment and pro-democracy camps no longer occur.
Mr Choy said, "Without having to worry about re-election, members no longer need to scrutinise government policies to prove themselves. In the long run, the LegCo's supervision of the government will weaken."
Can a LegCo that passes bills quickly reflect public opinion?
Electoral Affairs Commission chairman Barnabas Fung Wah casting a ballot at a mock polling station station in Hong Kong, China, on Dec 14, 2021. PHOTO: EPA-EFE
Mr Choy questioned whether the LegCo with its current culture of passing bills so quickly is able to represent the views of different stakeholders, and fully reflect public opinion.
Mr Sung Lap Kung, director of the Hong Kong Progress and Perfection Research Institute, also opined that a politically homogeneous LegCo would mean that unlike in the past, many livelihood motions, such as those on housing issues and wealth disparity would be passed without serious opposition.
As for political motions, such as the enactment of Article 23 of the Hong Kong Basic Law, the lack of opposing opinions in the LegCo during debates may result in the seed of another social crisis being planted unwittingly.
But he also believes that after the term of the current government ends next July, Beijing will adopt a softer stance towards Hong Kong, such as extending an olive branch to the pro-democracy camp, to bring about social and economic progress.
Related Story
HK leader Carrie Lam outlines major housing plan, defends security law in policy speech
Related Story
China's march to common prosperity: A risky path for HK tycoons, investors
Non-pro-establishment candidates enjoy no advantage
Mr Chan Wai-keung, lecturer at the Community College of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, shared during an interview with Zaobao that the number of non-pro-establishment candidates contesting the upcoming election was more than he expected.
He predicts that these candidates would be able to win two to four seats via direct election in the geographical constituencies.
Mr Chan also pointed out that other than Mr Fung who is running in the Kowloon West geographical constituency, another non-pro-establishment candidate, Mr Jason Poon Chuk-hung, who is running in the Hong Kong Island East geographical constituency, also has a chance of winning because "there are more middle-class Hong Kongers residing in Hong Kong Island, and they prefer to support the democratic parties".
People walking past campaign flags for candidate Jason Poon, ahead of the Legislative Election on Dec 9, 2021. PHOTO: AFP
In an earlier interview with the local media, Mr Sung also predicted that the non-pro-establishment camp has a chance of winning four to five seats in the upcoming election.
But when interviewed by this journalist more recently, he changed his mind and predicted that the non-pro-establishment candidates may only win a seat for social welfare in the functional constituency and none via direct election.
Non-pro-establishment camp unable to mobilise supporters
Mr Sung explained that he previously thought that as former LegCo members, non-pro-establishment candidates, such as Ms Tam, Mr Fung, and Mr Nelson Wong Sing-chi could gain the support of voters with their visibility.
However, based on what he saw recently, public response towards the election has been rather lukewarm.
This coupled with subpar publicity efforts from the support teams of these candidates mean that supporters will be reluctant to vote, impacting their chances of winning.
Election posters are seen in a market on Dec 8, 2021. A survey found that only 52 per cent of Hong Kong residents indicated that they would vote in the upcoming election, the lowest figure since 1991. PHOTO: AFP
Using Mr Fung as an example, Mr Sung explained that in the Kowloon West geographical constituency that Mr Fung is contesting, the streets were decorated with the flags and banners of candidates as early as a month before voting day in previous elections.
"But the atmosphere of this year's election has been rather flat. Many non-pro-establishment voters feel that Mr Fung betrayed the pro-democracy camp, and are unwilling to vote for him again," said Mr Sung.
In reality, fulfilling the nomination criteria was already a tall order for the non-pro-establishment candidates.
For instance, the Path of Democracy party intended to field four candidates, but struggled to meet the nomination criteria. It was only after a public appeal for help that the party managed to successfully file nomination submissions for three of its candidates.
Mr Sung feels that non-pro-establishment candidates who advocate forging a third path would find themselves in the difficult situation of ostracising everyone, and end up losing all in the direct election.
He said: "On one hand, pro-establishment supporters regard these candidates as outsiders, on the other hand, they are also out of favour in the pro-democracy camp, so no one is coming forward to lend them support, and the supporters of the conventional pro-democracy parties may not vote for them too."
This article was first published in thinkchina.sg, an English language e-magazine by Lianhe Zaobao. More on this topic
Related Story
Hong Kong quietly widens national security law with subtle shift
Related Story
How China's security law changed Hong Kong forever in 12 months
Join ST's Telegram channel here and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Topics:
More Whatsapp Linkedin FB Messenger Telegram Reddit WeChat Pinterest Print Purchase Article Copy permalink https://str.sg/3YJr