用户名/邮箱
登录密码
验证码
看不清?换一张
您好,欢迎访问! [ 登录 | 注册 ]
您的位置:首页 - 最新资讯
Judge defines Monster Munch in bizarre ruling on Walkers’ poppadoms
2024-01-21 00:00:00.0     独立报-英国新闻     原网页

       

       Get the free Morning Headlines email for news from our reporters across the world Sign up to our free Morning Headlines email

       Please enter a valid email address

       Please enter a valid email address

       SIGN UP

       I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy notice

       Thanks for signing up to the

       Morning Headlines email

       {{ #verifyErrors }} {{ message }} {{ /verifyErrors }} {{ ^verifyErrors }} Something went wrong. Please try again later {{ /verifyErrors }}

       A judge has ruled that Walkers’ poppadoms are crisps rather than the popular Indian food, as the company lost at a tax tribunal.

       The decision was handed down last week after the company argued that the treats should be classed as a food rather than a snack for VAT reasons, potentially saving millions of pounds a year.

       The tribunal ruled that snacks are “similar to potato crisps” and so are not eligible for zero-rated VAT. As a result, Walkers will have to continue to pay the standard 20 per cent VAT on the products.

       Walkers will have to pay millions more in tax every year after losing at a tax tribunal

       " srcset="https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2015/02/16/16/walkers-crisps.jpg?quality=75&width=320&auto=webp 320w, https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2015/02/16/16/walkers-crisps.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp 640w" src="https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2015/02/16/16/walkers-crisps.jpg" data-gallery-length="3" class="i-amphtml-fill-content i-amphtml-replaced-content" pinger-seen="true">

       Walkers will have to pay millions more in tax every year after losing at a tax tribunal

       (Dan Taylor/CreativeCommons)

       In the ruling documents, it was seen that Walkers claimed that its mini-poppadoms were not crisps as they used potato granules and had distinct flavours that were unusual for crisps.

       RECOMMENDED

       Indignant Donald Trump pouts, rips civil fraud lawsuit in newly released deposition video

       Undo

       Mourners fill church to remember the Iowa principal who risked life to save kids in school shooting

       Undo

       Vibriance

       Walmart Shoppers Say This Drugstore Wrinkle Cream Is Actually Worth ItVibriance| Sponsored Sponsored

       Undo

       Dr. Kellyann Wellness

       Doctor Says Slimming Down After 60 Comes Down To ThisDr. Kellyann Wellness| Sponsored Sponsored

       Undo

       Powered by Taboola Powered by Taboola

       The snacks come in an assortment of flavours including lime and corriander chutney and mango and red chilli chutney.

       However, in her ruling, tribunal judge Anne Fairpo said: “In a world which contains crisps with flavours as diverse as hedgehog, haggis, sweet chilli, sour cream, and cheese and port, we are not convinced by the argument that there are any flavours which could be said to be distinct from those used for potato crisps.”

       The company also argued that the crisps were “closer to a poppadom, being intended to be eaten with an Indian-style meal”, rather than alone as a traditional crisp would be.

       Walkers crisps

       (PA Archive)

       Walkers also argued that they were indeed not a crisp as they were named “poppadoms, unlike potato crisps”.

       Promoted stories

       New Mazda CX50

       Mazda CX50 Is A True Head Turner (You'll Double Take At The Price)New Mazda CX50

       Undo

       by Taboola by Taboola

       Sponsored Links Sponsored Links

       Promoted Links Promoted Links

       In response, Judge Fairpo said: “Nominative determinism is not a characteristic of snack foods. Calling a snack food ‘Hula Hoops’ does not mean that one could twirl that product around one’s midriff. Nor is ‘Monster Munch’ generally reserved as a food for monsters.”

       Lawyers also argued the snacks should be considered poppadoms due to the inclusion of gram flour, which is used in the genuine product.

       However, the judge found that gram flour only made up around 14 per cent of the product and there was much more potato included.

       The tribunal dismissed the appeal and ultimately in its ruling, the panel concluded: “Having concluded that the products are made from the potato and potato starch, it is therefore irrelevant whether the products are similar to poppadoms. What matters is whether they are similar to potato crisps.”

       McVitie’s took HMRC to court over a decade ago to argue that Jaffa Cakes were cakes rather than biscuits to save considerable cash on VAT.

       The Independent has contacted Walkers for a comment.

       More about Walkers Food VAT snacks crips

       Join our commenting forum Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

       3Comments

       1/ 3Judge forced to describe Monster Munch in bizarre ruling on poppadoms

       Judge forced to describe Monster Munch in bizarre ruling on poppadoms

       Walkers will have to pay millions more in tax every year after losing at a tax tribunal

       Dan Taylor/CreativeCommons

       Judge forced to describe Monster Munch in bizarre ruling on poppadoms

       Walkers crisps

       PA Archive

       Judge forced to describe Monster Munch in bizarre ruling on poppadoms

       The tribunal ruled that snacks are similar to potato crisps and so are not eligible for zero-rated VAT.

       Dan Taylor/CreativeCommons

       CCPA Notice Promoted stories

       Eggland's Best

       Eggland’s Best. Better taste. Better nutrition. Better eggs.Enjoy America’s superior tasting egg?.Eggland's Best| Sponsored Sponsored

       Try Now

       Undo

       The True Detective debacle shows Rotten Tomatoes is becoming a useless websiteThe showrunner of the returning crime anthology complained that the Jodie Foster-fronted series had been targeted by ‘bros’ on Rotten Tomatoes. The problem goes deeper than a few men with a grudge, writes Louis Chilton – review aggregators are eating themselves aliveThe Independent

       Undo

       YourPennySaver

       US Residents Birthed Before 1976 Now Entitled To These "Ridiculous" Benefits In JanuaryTap to see a list of 24 "legal" ways to get a kickback if you're over 45 and live in the US. Many are stoked to learn theseYourPennySaver| Sponsored Sponsored

       Learn More

       Undo

       Super C Serum

       Target Shoppers Say This Drugstore Wrinkle Cream Is Actually Worth ItSuper C Serum| Sponsored Sponsored

       Undo

       Health Today

       When Neuropathy Hits, Try This (It's Genius!)Discover The Latest Breakthrough In Neuropathy ReliefHealth Today| Sponsored Sponsored

       Learn More

       Undo

       Read More Comments

       Collapse Comments

       ? Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article

       Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.

       Subscribe

       Already subscribed? Log in

       


标签:综合
关键词: poppadoms     ruling     Walkers     potato     crisps     Sponsored     tribunal     email    
滚动新闻