SEOUL - The Myers-Briggs personality test is no laughing matter in South Korea.

       Though generally regarded as “pseudoscientific”, the self-reported Myers-Briggs Type Indicator test is immensely popular in South Korea, particularly among younger people, as a tool to help them understand both themselves and others.

       Categorising everyone into 16 different personality types, the MBTI essentially comes down to a four-letter code, such as ISTP or ENFJ, with each letter suggesting a certain personality trait. But it is the third letter – T for “thinking” or F for “feeling” – that has taken centre stage these days in South Korea as a measure of what is believed to be one’s emotional capacity.

       “Are you a T?” some may ask, which seldom comes across as a compliment.

       By definition, people who test as T – “thinking” – tend to be more objective and logical, while those who test as F – “feeling” – tend to be more sensitive and emotionally expressive, according to Neris Analytics, the firm behind the popular online personality test. Yet, to be precise, their free online test technically differs from the original MBTI.

       More often than not, the distinction between Ts and Fs carries a heavier weight in South Korean society, where knowledge-based, more logically inclined “thinkers” are perceived as lacking empathy or emotional depth.

       The line “are you a T?” was popularised by YouTube comedy channel Mimgorithm last year. People found it humorous when a female comedian, dripping with sarcasm, threw the question at others whose too-honest, matter-of-fact comments spoilt the mood.

       By signing up, I accept SPH Media's Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy as amended from time to time.

       Beneath the playful jab lies a sense of annoyance from the speaker, frustrated by her friend’s inability to respond in the way she had hoped.

       The phrase has resonated with South Koreans since, spawning a wave of derivative memes online, including a cursed variation, along with various offline products. Last month, Baskin-Robbins Korea launched an Earl Grey ice cream flavour cheekily named “Are You Tea?”

       Nowadays, the question is often seen used as a passive-aggressive dig at anyone who seems unable to empathise with others.

       According to a woman surnamed Song – a university student in her 20s who self-reports as an INFP personality type – while this type of categorisation is common across various social circles, it can become especially pronounced in romantic relationships, as in South Korea lovers are expected to be on the same emotional frequency and highly attuned to each other’s emotional patterns and needs.

       “People with a logical mindset are all about finding solutions, whereas the other side just wants emotional support,” said Ms Song. When friends talk about issues with their dates or other friends, it often boils down to the question, “Is your boyfriend or girlfriend a T?’”

       Statistically, personality types with T characteristics are a minority, though a sizable one.

       According to 2021 data from Neris Analytics Limited, based on a sample of 70,266 South Korean respondents, the ratio of thinking to feeling traits is 3.3 to 6.7. In the United States, an analysis of a much bigger data set collected from 1972 through 2002 shows a less pronounced ratio of 4 to 6.

       Mr Kim Bum-jun, a 26-year-old Seoul resident who self-reports as ISTP, is no stranger to the accusation.

       “Many have asked me that question in a half-joking manner whenever I make remarks that come off as cold and factual,” Mr Kim said. “Even when I put in effort to give thoughtful and caring responses, people would still label me ‘soul-less.’”

       He admitted that he tends to approach issues from a realistic perspective based on reasoning and facts, rather than in an emotionally responsive, empathetic manner that many of his friends seem to expect.

       “I do have emotions,” he said, adding that expressing them verbally is not exactly a breeze.

       Some go as far as to say that whether one is a thinker or feeler is beside the point. “Its implication is akin to asking, ‘Can’t you read the room?’” said one 30-something who works in Seoul.

       On the contrary, for some, the dichotomy of the four-letter codes is just too simplistic.

       Mr Kim Hyun-sung, in his 30s, is a sceptic of MBTI. He contends that human beings are too complex to be neatly categorised into just 16 personality types. Even among individuals with the same personality type, there can be significant variations, he believes.

       Other overextended binaries include the first letter – “introverted” or “extroverted” – as indicative of one’s sociability and shyness, and the fourth letter – “judging” or “prospecting” – associated with a person’s level of flexibility in planning.

       Some worry that people might use their T personality type as justification for their actions.

       A user on Blind, an anonymous online platform for verified employees, stated that being logical is not synonymous with being less empathetic. “If they claim there’s nothing they can do because they’re Ts, it’s more of an excuse for their lack of understanding and consideration.”

       Experts also point out that personalities are not set in stone.

       Psychology professor Kim Kyung-il at Ajou University questioned the validity of specific personality type labels during a radio broadcast that was aired by state broadcaster KBS in 2023.

       Mr Kim stated that MBTI test results mirror how individuals perceive themselves in certain social situations. Rather than calling it one’s “personality type”, he said he preferred to describe it as an indicator of one’s “social mask” or “social role”.

       In a similar vein, cultural psychologist and author of multiple psychology books Han Min shared with The Korea Herald that the test is less about defining personality and more about understanding one’s “disposition”.

       As for why someone’s T trait is highlighted in this recently popular put-down, Mr Han says people seek validation for their emotions. “The fact that the question is directed at peers reveals longing for empathy and understanding from those who can relate to their experiences.”

       In fact, it is not the first time such a label has been pinned on a certain group of people, according to Mr Han. Before the MBTI craze, astrology and blood type personality theories were a popular means of determining a person’s character.

       In the lingo of blood type personality theory – which Korean media started to report on in the early 2000s – people with a T personality type have, in a sense, inherited stereotypes tied to those with blood type B: too straightforward, overly blunt and even cold-hearted.

       Yet, despite its limitations as the sole benchmark for assessing personality, Mr Han recognised merits of the test.

       “It is a more scientific and accurate alternative to other pseudoscientific beliefs,” he explained. “It could act as a bridge to foster understanding among individuals.”

       University student Song affirmed this, saying the personality test has provided her a window into a better understanding of those on the opposite end of the spectrum.

       “’I’ve come to terms with thinkers,” she noted. “Now I know that that they aren’t cold, but just operate in a different way.” THE KOREA HERALD/ASIA NEWS NETWORK