Goran Hansson, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences secretary general, and other members of the committee for economics, announce the winners’ names during a news conference in Stockholm.—Reuters

       STOCKHOLM: Three US-based academics on Monday won the Nobel Economics Prize for research on the labour market using “natural experiments”, or observational studies, that have revolutionised empirical research in the field, the jury said.

       Canadian-American David Card, Israeli-American Joshua Angrist and Dutch-American Guido Imbens shared the prize for providing “new insights about the labour market” and showing “what conclusions about cause and effect can be drawn from natural experiments,” the Nobel committee said in a statement.

       The Economics Prize wrapped up a male-dominated 2021 Nobel season which saw a total of 12 men win prizes and only one woman.

       Card won half of the 10-million-kronor ($1.1 million, one million euro) prize for work focused on the labour market effects of minimum wages, immigration and education.

       The Canadian-born professor at University of California at Berkeley commented on the honour in a self-effacing manner, saying in a statement that his “contributions are pretty modest.” In natural experiments, researchers study the result of chance events or policy changes on groups of people, unlike other experiments where scientists have control over their subjects.

       “Most old-fashioned economists are very theoretical, but these days, a large fraction of economics is really very nuts-and-bolts, looking at subjects like education or health, or at the effects of immigration,” Card said in a statement published by his university.

       “These are really very, very simple things. So, my big contribution was to oversimplify the field,” he added.

       Card’s studies from the early 1990s, where he evaluated the effects of a raised minimum wage in New Jersey, showed for example that raising the minimum wage does not necessarily lead to fewer jobs.

       Focusing on fast-food workers, Card used eastern Pennsylvania, which has a similar labour market, as a control group.

       Card also used other natural experiments — such as the sudden influx of 125,000 Cubans to the US in 1980 — to study the impact of immigration and education.

       The Nobel committee noted that “we now know that the incomes of people who were born in a country can benefit from new immigration, while people who immigrated at an earlier time risk being negatively affected. We have also realised that resources in schools are far more important for students’ future labour market success than was previously thought.”

       However, data from natural experiments are difficult to interpret. For their work helping to solve that methodological problem, the other half of the prize went jointly to Angrist, 61, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and Imbens, a 58-year-old professor at Stanford.

       In research they conducted in the mid-1990s, they demonstrated how “precise conclusions about cause and effect can be drawn,” and specifically what conclusions can be drawn.

       The framework they developed has been widely adopted by researchers who work with observational data.

       “By clarifying the assumptions necessary to establish a causal relationship, their framework has also increased the transparency — and thus credibility — of empirical research,” the committee said.

       Published in Dawn, October 12th, 2021