用户名/邮箱
登录密码
验证码
看不清?换一张
您好,欢迎访问! [ 登录 | 注册 ]
您的位置:首页 - 最新资讯
Judge rebukes Tucker Carlson, ‘QAnon Shaman’ for ‘alarming’ Jan. 6 spin
2023-07-22 00:00:00.0     华盛顿邮报-华盛顿特区     原网页

       Comment on this story Comment

       Gift Article

       Share

       correction

       A previous version of this article incorrectly referred to Jacob Chansley, the "QAnon Shaman" who pleaded guilty to obstructing Congress during the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, appearing on Tucker Carlson's show on Fox News Channel. Video clips featuring Chansley were shown on the program. The article has been corrected.

       A federal judge on Thursday denied a bid from Jacob Chansley to withdraw his guilty plea to obstructing Congress on Jan. 6 and rebuked the so-called “QAnon Shaman” over relying on edited video from a Tucker Carlson program that gave a distorted view of the riot.

       Wp Get the full experience.Choose your plan ArrowRight

       Chansley’s bare chest, painted face, and hat of fur and horns made him one of the most recognizable participants in the attack. He was also one of the first rioters to admit to a felony crime. Judge Royce C. Lamberth sentenced him in November 2021 to 41 months in prison, the low end of federal sentencing guidelines, after Chansley said he was “truly repentant” and called his behavior “indefensible.”

       “I think your remarks are the most remarkable that I’ve heard in 34 years” as a judge, Lamberth, a Reagan appointee, said at the time. “I think you are genuine in your remorse.”

       Security footage from the Capitol shows Jacob Chansley entering the building after rioters broke through the front doors on Jan. 6, 2021. (Video: U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia)

       Chansley finished his sentence in March. But after leaving prison, he asked Lamberth to undo his conviction, saying security camera footage from inside the Capitol aired by Fox News host Tucker Carlson a few weeks prior showed police allowed him to wander around the building on Jan. 6. The attorney who represented Chansley when he took his plea appeared on Fox and told Carlson he did not have that video at the time.

       Jan. 6 ‘shaman’ Jake Angeli finds his spiritual beliefs a hard sell

       Lamberth, in a 35-page ruling, denied Chansley’s bid while laying out in detail why the claim that he and other rioters were allowed in and around the Capitol by police is false.

       Advertisement

       All but 10 seconds of the video Carlson showed was produced to Chansley before his sentencing, Lamberth said, and the surveillance video Chansley now claims undermines his conviction is duplicative of police body-camera footage he was given months before he decided to plead guilty.

       “These videos are decidedly not exculpatory,” Lamberth wrote. “Such footage, conveniently omitted by the [Fox News] program, shows nearly all of Mr. Chansley’s actions that day, including: carrying a six-foot-long pole armed with a spearhead, unlawfully entering the Capitol through a broken door, disobeying orders from law enforcement on more than a half-dozen occasions, screaming obscenities, entering the Senate chamber, climbing onto the Senate dais, sitting in the Vice President’s chair, and leaving a threatening message for the Vice President.” He added, “That law enforcement officers outnumbered by the quantity of rioters did not physically engage Mr. Chansley or impede his progress is irrelevant.”

       Lamberth said that if Chansley had gone to trial or fought conditions of the plea, as he now says he should have, he would have still been convicted and faced a higher sentence for not accepting responsibility. He said he was “disappointed” that Chansley had disavowed the remorse that had impressed the judge at sentencing.

       Advertisement

       “Such an about-face casts serious doubt on the veracity of any of Mr. Chansley’ s claims, here or elsewhere,” Lamberth wrote.

       Chansley’s current attorney, William Shipley, said on Twitter that his client “has moved forward” and will likely not challenge the conviction any further.

       Several other defendants have argued unsuccessfully that the Fox News presentation is exonerating.

       After dismissing Chansley’s claims that the government failed to turn over information and that his attorney was not effective, Lamberth went on to express his concern with Carlson’s misleading depiction on the riot, calling it not just “ill-advised” and inaccurate but “alarming.”

       “The host explicitly questioned the integrity of this Court — not to mention the legitimacy of the entire U.S. criminal justice system — with inflammatory characterizations of cherry-picked videos stripped of their proper context,” he wrote, “language resembling the destructive, misguided rhetoric that fueled the events of January 6 in the first place.”

       Advertisement

       The judge suggested that “members of the public who are concerned about the evidence presented in Mr. Chansley’s case and others” read the public filings and attend court hearings.

       “Those of us who have presided over dozens of cases arising from, listened to hundreds of hours of testimony describing, and reviewed thousands of pages of briefing about the attack on our democracy of January 6 know all too well that neither the events of that day nor any particular defendant’s involvement can be fully captured in a seconds-long video carelessly, or perhaps even cynically, aired in a television segment or attached to a tweet,” he wrote.

       Carlson did not immediately return a request for comment.

       The Capitol surveillance footage aired on Fox News was given to Carlson by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.); Carlson had demanded the video as a condition of supporting McCarthy’s bid to lead the House against a right-wing revolt. Carlson was fired by Fox News in April, just after the network settled a defamation claim involving false claims about the 2020 election.

       The Jan. 6 insurrection The report: The Jan. 6 committee released its final report, marking the culmination of an 18-month investigation into the violent insurrection. Read The Post’s analysis about the committee’s new findings and conclusions.

       The final hearing: The House committee investigating the attack on the U.S. Capitol held its final public meeting where members referred four criminal charges against former president Donald Trump and others to the Justice Department. Here’s what the criminal referrals mean.

       The riot: On Jan. 6, 2021, a pro-Trump mob stormed the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to stop the certification of the 2020 election results. Five people died on that day or in the immediate aftermath, and 140 police officers were assaulted.

       Inside the siege: During the rampage, rioters came perilously close to penetrating the inner sanctums of the building while lawmakers were still there, including former vice president Mike Pence. The Washington Post examined text messages, photos and videos to create a video timeline of what happened on Jan. 6. Here’s what we know about what Trump did on Jan. 6.

       Comments

       Gift this articleGift Article

       Jan. 6 committee hearings

       HAND CURATED

       Key findings from the Jan. 6 committee’s final report

       December 23, 2022

       Key findings from the Jan. 6 committee’s final report

       December 23, 2022

       What the Jan. 6 probe found out about social media, but didn’t report

       January 17, 2023

       What the Jan. 6 probe found out about social media, but didn’t report

       January 17, 2023

       Social Security numbers of Trump officials, allies posted in Jan. 6 files

       January 6, 2023

       Social Security numbers of Trump officials, allies posted in Jan. 6 files

       January 6, 2023

       View 3 more stories

       Loading...

       View more

       


标签:综合
关键词: Lamberth     Capitol     Carlson     video     article     Chansley     rioters    
滚动新闻