GEIS-新闻详情

Doctors should dig into biological differences to improve heart failure treatment in women: Expert

2024-03-20 00:00:00.0 海峡时报-新加坡原网页

SINGAPORE – Women have a smaller heart than men and experience different outcomes when undergoing treatment for heart failure. Yet, doctors here continue to use the same yardstick for diagnosis and treatment for both groups, causing therapies to work less well in women.

There is thus a need for change in guidelines on how women with heart failure are diagnosed and treated, said Professor Carolyn Lam, director of women’s heart health at the National Heart Centre Singapore (NHCS). Her research in the last decade has found that male and female patients respond differently to medical and device therapies for heart failure and cardiac rehabilitation, and they have different treatment outcomes.

“We are no longer simply describing – that women having heart failure are older, thinner, smaller, and more symptomatic. Now, we actually have demonstrable differences in response to therapy and results,” said Prof Lam.

Prof Lam, who is also a senior consultant in the department of cardiology at NHCS, said that although biological differences in epidemiology, risk factors, clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart failure are well known, research in the last decade has “only just shed light on an often overlooked aspect of heart failure: the influence of sex on treatment response”.

While there are similarities in how men and women respond to heart failure therapies, “the differences lie in treatment benefits, response to dosages, tolerability to medical therapy, device therapy and cardiac rehabilitation”. She cited the example of cardiac resynchronisation therapy, a treatment using a pacemaker to help the heart beat with the right rhythm.

“We found that if you apply the same criteria to a woman’s heart and give it the same therapy (as that for a man), the woman’s heart derives far more response. Intrinsically, a woman’s heart is smaller. By the time you apply the same guidelines to define abnormality as that of a man whose heart is bigger, then it would already be very serious for the woman,” she said.

Women also have more body fat, which means different drug treatments will have varying efficacies.

Get a round-up of the top stories to start your day

Thank you!

By signing up, I accept SPH Media's Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy as amended from time to time.

Yes, I would also like to receive SPH Media Group's SPH Media Limited, its related corporations and affiliates as well as their agents and authorised service providers.

marketing and promotions.

“With the same dose, you may get far more toxicity in women than men,” she added.

“Why then are we still continuing to use the same yardstick, which is always right for the man but not for the woman? That is the main reason for things being haywire,” she said. “We need to define guidelines according to what is normal for a woman versus what is normal for a man.”

Prof Lam also pointed out the bias in research.

“There are international studies where females are underrepresented, especially in all the heart trials, and even if they’re represented, the aggregated results are never looked at,” she said.

This male bias is seen across all fields of pre-clinical research, she noted.