用户名/邮箱
登录密码
验证码
看不清?换一张
您好,欢迎访问! [ 登录 | 注册 ]
您的位置:首页 - 最新资讯
Judge rejects Trump defence that President Records Act allowed him to hoard confidential papers
2024-04-05 00:00:00.0     独立报-美国政治     原网页

       The judge overseeing the classified documents case against Donald Trump has denied his motion to dismiss the case based on the Presidential Records Act (PRA), which the former president claims gives him the authority to retain papers containing national security information.

       In a Thursday afternoon filing, District Court Judge Aileen Cannon denied Mr Trump’s request to dismiss the case saying the counts in the indictment made, “no reference to the Presidential Records Act” and that it “does not provide a pre-trial basis to dismiss.”

       The PRA, a 1978 law, requires presidents to return official records, notes and documents to the government upon leaving office but allows them to keep personal ones.

       The former president has often invoked the PRA in declaring his innocence in the case, claiming he made documents, even those containing national security information, “personal” when he took them to his Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida after leaving the White House in 2021.

       Federal prosecutors have pushed back on the argument, claiming it is the wrong interpretation of the PRA.

       Earlier this week, it seemed Judge Cannon was willing to accept the PRA as a valid defence when she filed proposed jury instructions to each side, asking them to embrace parts of Mr Trump’s PRA argument.

       Special Counsel Jack Smith responded to her filing with apparent frustration, calling her pursuit of the legal premise “wrong.”

       But in the final paragraph of Thursday’s three-page filing, Judge Cannon also denied Mr Smith’s request for finalised jury instruction and defended her proposed jury instruction form.

       Mirroring the federal prosecutors’ tone, Judge Cannon called Mr Smith’s request “unprecedented and unjust”.

       She added that her proposed jury instruction should not be “misconstrued as declaring a final definition of any essential element or asserted defense in this case” and was only “a genuine attempt… to better understand the parties’ competing positions and the questions to be submitted to the jury.”

       Mr Trump or Mr Smith can appeal Judge Cannon’s decision.

       This a breaking news story, more follows…


标签:政治
关键词: filing     instruction     dismiss     denied     Aileen Cannon     Judge    
滚动新闻