ADVERTISEMENT
''I have decided to continue on with even more strength at the helm of the government of Spain,” he said in a televised speech after informing King Felipe VI of the decision earlier Monday.
But many wondered if it was necessary to keep the country in suspense for five days, and had expected Sanchez to either resign or to call a confidence motion.
Sanchez said after days of reflection, he saw his continuity as a new chapter, and said that he will dedicate his efforts to the regeneration of political life and to expel what he considers to be a campaign of lies and discredit from the far-right.
''It is a decision that does not mean a return to the status quo, this will mark a before and after, I promise you that,'' Sanchez said, without detailing what steps he could take to curtail ''the smear campaign'' he said he and his family is facing.
His resignation would have deprived Europe of a prominent Socialist prime minister ahead of European elections in June and at a time when the centre-right increasingly holds sway.
Although he stated that his decision was not based on political calculations, the prime minister has managed to mobilise his electorate and introduce a new narrative for the upcoming European elections, where one of the central issues could be defence of democratic integrity and the way politics are conducted, as well as the protection of institutions against the far-right.
In an emotional letter posted on X, Sanchez wrote that he could no longer just stand aside and watch his wife being targeted by a legal probe brought by allegations by a right-wing platform that accused her of using her position to influence business deals.
The group, Manos Limpias, or Clean Hands, acknowledged that the complaint was based on newspaper articles. Madrid's public prosecutor has said it should be thrown out due to a lack of evidence.
Sanchez blamed the investigation against his wife on online news sites politically aligned with the leading opposition conservative Popular Party and the far-right Vox party that spread what he called ''spurious'' allegations.
Spain's conservative opposition leader Alberto Nunez Feijoo said Sanchez’s behaviour in ''neglecting his duties'' was unbecoming of a leader. Manu Fernandez/Copyright 2024 The AP. All rights reserved.
The Popular Party, however, said Sanchez’s behaviour was unbecoming of a leader. That party and Vox have regularly compared him to a dictator and a traitor to Spain.
''(Sanchez) has pulled the leg of a nation of 48 million people,'' Popular Party leader Alberto Nunez Feijoo said. ''He neglected his duties for five days as part of a campaign ploy.''
ADVERTISEMENT
During his visit, Stoltenberg said NATO countries had failed to deliver in good time what they promised to Ukraine, but that 'support is on the way,'
NATO countries failed to deliver in good time what they promised, said the NATO Secretary-General.
Ukranian President Volodymr Zelenskyy met NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg in Kyiv on Monday.
Stoltenberg said NATO countries failed to deliver in time what was promised to Ukraine, allowing Russia to exploit battlefield advantages and gain ground.
‘Ukraine has been outgunned for months,’ he said, ‘but it’s not too late for Ukraine to prevail. More support is on the way.’
Zelenskyy said new Western supplies have started arriving, but slowly.
The meeting comes a day after Russian state TV aired footage of an exhibition of Western equipment captured in Ukraine.
30 armoured vehicles from the US, UK, Germany and other countries can be seen in the exhibition.
ADVERTISEMENT
With the gaze of much of the world fixed on the wars unfolding in Gaza and Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin continues to expand his country’s reach in Africa.
He is now using Libya as a stepping stone to position Russian submarines in the central Mediterranean and place nuclear weapons on Europe’s southern flank.
Enrico Borghi, a centrist MP and member of the Italian parliament’s intelligence committee, recently warned that Russia’s interest in Tobruk in Libya is no mystery, which could be a preamble for sending its nuclear submarines there, much like the Soviet Union sent its missiles to Cuba in 1962.
It is clear that having submarines a few hundred kilometres from NATO states would not be good for security.
In light of this, Washington's move to reopen an embassy in Libya a decade after suspending its operations in the country is significant.
Not only is a strong Russian presence in Libya, a security threat to NATO and Europe — Libya’s geographic location, linking Niger, Chad and Sudan to North Africa and Europe, makes it of vital strategic importance.
Russian footprints all over
The Russian footprint in Libya has grown substantially, alongside an evolving military presence evidenced by a recent delivery of military supplies to the port of Tobruk.
This strategic eastern city saw the arrival of armoured vehicles, weapons, and equipment — the fifth such shipment within a brief span, indicative of a systematic build-up.
The supplies, presumed to have been dispatched from Russia's naval facility in Tartus, Syria were transported by vessels of its Northern Fleet, reflecting an unyielding commitment to Moscow's Mediterranean gambit that has survived the impacts of the war in Ukraine.
The entrenchment in Libya also serves as a gateway for deeper inroads into Africa where Moscow is astutely exploiting a partnership void, offering African regimes military and economic collaboration devoid of the conditionalised engagements favoured by Western patrons.
Russian nuclear submarine, Yuri Dolgoruky, is seen during sea trials near Arkhangelsk, July 2009 AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko
The shipment and what it entails are not an isolated development but part of a broader Russian pattern to establish a perpetual military presence akin to its nearly decade-long posture in Syria.
Such an expansion is a direct challenge to NATO's southern flank.
Putin commissions two nuclear submarines and says more are to come Russia and China practice 'capturing a submarine' in joint military drills
The introduction of advanced air defence systems by Russian operators in Libya that threaten Western “over-the-horizon” counter-threat operations across North Africa and the Sahel shifts the regional balance of control in the air, while also threatening freedom of navigation since the delivery of anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities will negate NATO's operational reach in its own backyard.
How prepared is the West for Lybia's further decline?
The entrenchment in Libya also serves as a gateway for deeper inroads into Africa where Moscow is astutely exploiting a partnership void, offering African regimes military and economic collaboration devoid of the conditionalised engagements favoured by Western patrons.
Furthermore, Russia's pursuit of a naval presence in Libya's eastern region, likely to culminate into a base for its nuclear submarines, provides Moscow with more than just a strategic outpost looking towards the entire EU.
It adds a frustrating layer of complexity to NATO's security calculus now weighing steady Russian gains in Ukraine, and the long-term impacts of the US pullout from Niger and potentially Chad.
Simply put, Moscow's playbook in Libya is changing from the usual fusion of military engagement with political influence in Libya, partly facilitated by the alignment with regional strongman Khalifa Haftar.
Libya's Khalifa Hifter, the commander of the self-styled Libyan National Army, is seen at the International Defense Exhibition and Conference in Abu Dhabi, February 2023 AP Photo/Jon Gambrell
Simply put, Moscow's playbook in Libya is changing from the usual fusion of military engagement with political influence in Libya, partly facilitated by the alignment with regional strongman Khalifa Haftar.
By supplanting Western influence, Russia's opportunism and leveraging of geopolitical fault lines have helped enhance its stature even at the height of a needless war in Ukraine.
In Africa, Russia seeks to retain its superpower credentials Niger is the latest victim of Africa’s development paradox
The cascading impact of Moscow's manoeuvring raises serious questions about the West's preparedness for the declining prospects of a stable, secure and sovereign Libya.
ADVERTISEMENT
This is why Washington's decision to reestablish a diplomatic presence in Libya is a strategic bid aimed at countering Russia's growing presence, while simultaneously bolstering the United Nations Support Mission.
The US is back in town, however
The move comes after a palpable hiatus pointing to recalibrated approaches in Washington's Libya file to embody a strategic calculus that transcends traditional diplomacy, for a re-engagement that can effectively counteract Russia’s growing inroads into Africa.
It is the clearest reflection yet of the interplay between geopolitical rivalry and the urgency of stabilising a paralysed country on Europe's southern periphery.
By re-establishing a physical diplomatic footprint in Libya, the US is taking a rare proactive stance that carries profound implications for Russia's ascent. The planned facility in Tripoli will facilitate closer monitoring and the ability to challenge Russian narratives and influence on the ground.
Re-introducing US diplomats to Libya is not merely a symbolic act. It will allow for persistent engagement with Libyan actors to maintain key relationships and develop a firm grasp on local dynamics that often elude remote diplomacy.
ADVERTISEMENT
A secure and stable Libya is deeply intertwined with broader interests that, when carefully managed, will help immunise the country from a rising tide of instability that could undermine its transition to a post-paralysis era.
a police officer waves vehicles through a checkpoint during rush hour in Benghazi, May 2019 AP Photo/Rami Musa
It also represents a tangible commitment to supporting UN-led mediation efforts and laying the groundwork for pivotal elections. A secure and stable Libya is deeply intertwined with broader interests that, when carefully managed, will help immunise the country from a rising tide of instability that could undermine its transition to a post-paralysis era.
The September 2012 attack on the US diplomatic mission in Benghazi cast a shadow over a US return to Libya, stifling any optimism for re-establishing a diplomatic presence.
The memory of the Benghazi attacks also galvanised an evolution in US diplomacy regarding Libya that is predicated on security and sustainability.
America's disastrous 'War on Terror' in Africa is now a global security crisis A Trump win would see Africa (and the world) spiral into climate hell
This includes cultivating ongoing on-the-ground engagement with Libyan actors and establishing robust channels for dialogue to address issues before escalations.
It is a welcome pivot towards pre-empting potential risks, intervening diplomatically to avert crises, and ensuring the Libyan polity is insulated from worsening regional vulnerabilities.
ADVERTISEMENT
There's no time to waste
Libya's protracted state of fragmentation poses challenges in Brussels' push to confront migrant surges, as any turmoil between Sub-Saharan Africa and the Maghreb acts as a catalyst for the mass movement of people towards Europe, with implications for security, political cohesion, and safety net systems within the EU.
Furthermore, the power vacuum in Libya could become a breeding ground for extremism that would be difficult to counteract given the enduring presence of mercenaries and foreign fighters, alongside deeply entrenched local militias across a very complicated security landscape.
To achieve sustainable peace, the US and Europe will have to leverage diplomatic pressure and develop effective strategies to uproot the political economies of Libya's hybrid actors that are key to their longevity.
In addition, Western involvement is critical for supporting the UN-brokered political settlement among Libyan actors, by providing an environment conducive to transparent electoral processes and equitable resource distribution.
Strategic engagement includes recognising Libyan sovereignty and facilitating national reconciliation through initiatives that reflect the "Libyan-owned and Libyan-led" principles, foundational to the UN's approach and stressed by Libyans themselves.
ADVERTISEMENT
Moreover, efforts to establish inclusive national mechanisms for the transparent and equitable management of Libya's wealth and resources must run parallel with political mediation.
Failure to do so risks undermining reconciliation efforts and the building of a stable, secure future by addressing long-term economic and political marginalisation, particularly in Libya's south.
Therefore, focused efforts on economic integration, accountability, and the rehabilitation of Libya's tattered social fabric, backed by Western support, will be crucial in restoring stability in Libya.
Hafed Al-Ghwell is the Executive Director of the North Africa Initiative (NAI) and Senior Fellow at the SAIS Foreign Policy Institute (FPI), Johns Hopkins University.
Contact us at view@euronews.com to send pitches or submissions and be part of the conversation.
ADVERTISEMENT