用户名/邮箱
登录密码
验证码
看不清?换一张
您好,欢迎访问! [ 登录 | 注册 ]
您的位置:首页 - 最新资讯
Trump can’t control fraud trial death threats, lawyers argue
2023-12-01 00:00:00.0     独立报-美国政治     原网页

       

       Sign up for the daily Inside Washington email for exclusive US coverage and analysis sent to your inbox Get our free Inside Washington email

       Please enter a valid email address

       Please enter a valid email address

       SIGN UP

       I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy notice

       Thanks for signing up to the

       Inside Washington email

       {{ #verifyErrors }} {{ message }} {{ /verifyErrors }} {{ ^verifyErrors }} Something went wrong. Please try again later {{ /verifyErrors }}

       Attorneys for Donald Trump claim “there is no indication” he can “exercise any control” over the flood of threatening messages from his supporters to his fraud trial judge and his chief clerk, subjected to near-daily attacks and insults from the former president.

       Mr Trump’s lawyers are urging a New York appeals court to permanently reject a gag order against their client during a civil fraud trial with his brand-building real estate empire at stake.

       But a filing from lawyers for Judge Arthur Engoron and New York Attorney General Letitia James last week argued that a gag order is necessary to protect the safety of the court’s staff, with a sworn statement from the court system’s top security official revealing that “hundreds of threats, disparaging and harassing comments and antisemitic messages” followed Mr Trump’s attacks.

       In response on Monday, Mr Trump’s attorneys appeared to downplay such threats, claiming that the “sole cognizable justification” to gag the former president “is that an unknown third party may react in a hostile or offensive manner” to his speech.

       “Since before the trial began and continuing thereafter, certain individuals, to whom there is no indication Petitioners have any connection or exercise any control, have engaged in behavior that Petitioners do not condone,” according to the filing from Mr Trump’s legal team.

       RECOMMENDED

       Trump hits out at judge’s wife as fraud trial gag order reinstated: Live

       Undo

       Robert De Niro left raging after anti-Trump speech censored

       Undo

       NTTデータ?スマートソーシング

       もうやった?「住所を入力するだけで」家の価値がわかる秘密の方法NTTデータ?スマートソーシング| Sponsored Sponsored

       Undo

       investing.com

       Greta Thunberg's Car Shocks The World, Proof In Picturesinvesting.com| Sponsored Sponsored

       Undo

       Powered by Taboola Powered by Taboola

       “The communications themselves, while vile and reprehensible, do not constitute a clear and present danger of imminent harm as required under established precedent,” they wrote.

       Promoted stories

       SportPirate

       河合奈保子、今の姿を确认する前に、ティッシュをご準备ください。SportPirate

       Undo

       by Taboola by Taboola

       Sponsored Links Sponsored Links

       Promoted Links Promoted Links

       Transcriptions of threatening voicemails after Mr Trump first targeted Judge Engoron’s chief clerk fill more than 275 single-spaced pages, according to Charles Hollon, an officer-captain with the court’s Department of Public Safety assigned to a judicial threats unit.

       The threats against them are “serious and credible and not hypothetical or speculative,” he wrote.

       A sample of messages left for the judge and clerk Allison Greenfield included homophobic and antisemitic attacks as well as explicit calls for violence against them.

       “You should be executed,” one message reads.

       “I mean, honestly, you should be assassinated,” reads another. “You should be killed.”

       Another warns “I will come for you. I don’t care. Ain’t nobody gonna stop me either.”

       Justice Arthur Engoron, right, presides over the civil fraud trial of the Trump Organization at the New York State Supreme Court in New York City, with his principal clerk Allison Greenfield.

       " srcset="https://static.independent.co.uk/2023/11/27/18/AFP_343J8HL.jpg?quality=75&width=320&auto=webp 320w, https://static.independent.co.uk/2023/11/27/18/AFP_343J8HL.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp 640w" src="https://static.independent.co.uk/2023/11/27/18/AFP_343J8HL.jpg" data-gallery-length="2" class="i-amphtml-fill-content i-amphtml-replaced-content">

       Justice Arthur Engoron, right, presides over the civil fraud trial of the Trump Organization at the New York State Supreme Court in New York City, with his principal clerk Allison Greenfield.

       (POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

       The filing from Mr Trump’s attorneys, which spans more than 1,900 pages, argues that Mr Trump and his legal team “have never called for violence” nor “encouraged, or even condoned, the behavior” outlined in the affidavit.

       But such comments “are not properly redressed by the wholesale suspension of [Mr Trump’s] First Amendment rights, especially where, as here, serious issues relating to partisan bias on the bench loom large,” according to his attorneys.

       Judge Engoron imposed a gag order for all parties in the trial to prohibit disparaging remarks about his court staff, after Mr Trump’s posted about Ms Greenfield on his Truth Social account. He subsequently violated the order twice, incurring $15,000 in fines paid by his attorneys.

       Earlier this month, Judge Engoron shot down what he called “unpersuasive” First Amendment arguments from Mr Trump’s attorneys against his gag orders, pointing to threats of political violence that have surrounded the former president’s criminal and civil cases since his first indictment earlier this year.

       “The First Amendment right of defendants and their attorneys to comment on my staff is far and away outweighed by the need to protect them from threats and physical harm,” he added.

       After the gag order was paused, Mr Trump continued to berate the judge, the attorney general and the clerk on his Truth Social page.

       A lawsuit from Ms James’s office accuses the former president, his two adult sons and chief business associates of grossly inflating his net worth and assets in financial statements given to banks and lenders to receive favourable financing terms.

       Judge Engoron has already found the defendants liable for fraud.

       The trial, now in its ninth week, could result in tens of millions of dollars in fines against the defendants.

       Federal judges also are reviewing a gag order against Mr Trump in a case surrounding his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

       During a hearing on Monday, a three-judge federal appeals court panel was skeptical of arguments from his legal team to overturn a gag order that blocks him from attacking witnesses and prosecutors in the criminal conspiracy case.

       The judges appeared likely to narrow the scope of the order, in an attempt to balance First Amendment protections around political speech while addressing the wave of threats and harassment unleashed by Mr Trump and his supporters towards the prosecutors, judges, witnesses and prospective jurors involved with a growing number of cases against him.

       A recent filing from US Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith’s team described that dynamic as “part of a pattern, stretching back years, in which people publicly targeted” by Mr Trump are “subject to harassment, threats, and intimidation.”

       Mr Trump “seeks to use this well-known dynamic to his advantage,” the filing added, and “it has continued unabated as this case and other unrelated cases involving the defendant have progressed.”

       When Mr Smith’s team updated their appeal to include news of the scale of threats in the New York case, attorneys for the former president called them “irrelevant” to the case.

       More about Donald Trump gag order New York Arthur Engoron Letitia James Trump Organization Jack Smith

       Join our commenting forum Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

       Comments

       1/ 2Trump can’t control fraud trial death threats, lawyers argue

       Trump can’t control fraud trial death threats, lawyers argue

       Justice Arthur Engoron, right, presides over the civil fraud trial of the Trump Organization at the New York State Supreme Court in New York City, with his principal clerk Allison Greenfield.

       POOL/AFP via Getty Images

       Trump can’t control fraud trial death threats, lawyers argue

       Donald Trump appears at his civil fraud trial in New York on 6 November.

       Getty Images

       Promoted stories

       北の快适工房

       楽天1位!爪杀菌ジェル│「正直、谛めてました」でも、使ってビックリ北の快适工房| Sponsored Sponsored

       Undo

       高知家

       コテコテ高知with高知家のおっちゃん円広志高知にはええとこがいっぱいあるで!川も山も映えスポットもアクティビティもあるから、何度でも来倒してや~!高知家| Sponsored Sponsored

       こちらをクリック

       Undo

       マイワインクラブ

       15年连続No.1。金赏ワインがお得に饮めるワインセットがすごい!3大铭醸地入り、世界の赤ワイン12本セット。现地で直接交渉?输入の特别価格セット。マイワインクラブ| Sponsored Sponsored

       今すぐ购入

       Undo

       Read More Comments

       Collapse Comments

       ? Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article

       Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.

       Subscribe

       Already subscribed? Log in

       


标签:政治
关键词: Engoron     attorneys     threats     judge     Sponsored     trial     Trump    
滚动新闻