Part of the RAND Gun Policy in America initiative, this tool allows users to explore how outcomes would change in each state and nationally if different combinations of gun policies were enacted or repealed nationwide. The results, based on the responses from a survey of gun policy experts, can also illustrate the trade-offs created when a group of policies improves one set of outcomes but undermines others.
Explore data on gun expert judgments in the expert-opinion tool.
Related Products
Project
Gun Policy in America Mar 1, 2018
Report
The Magnitude and Sources of Disagreement Among Gun Policy Experts: Second Edition Nov 30, 2021
Rosanna Smart @RosannaSmart, Andrew R. Morral @AndrewMorral, et al.
Report
The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States, Second Edition Apr 21, 2020
Rosanna Smart @RosannaSmart, Andrew R. Morral @AndrewMorral, et al.
Report
The Magnitude and Sources of Disagreement Among Gun Policy Experts Mar 1, 2018
Andrew R. Morral @AndrewMorral, Terry L. Schell, et al.
Tool
Development of the RAND State Firearm Law Database and Supporting Materials Sep 17, 2020
Samantha Cherney, Andrew R. Morral @AndrewMorral, et al.
News Release
Wide Disagreement Remains Among U.S. Gun Policy Experts; Five Policies Show Less Disagreement Nov 30, 2021
Research conducted by RAND Social and Economic Well-Being
The research described in this report was sponsored by Arnold Ventures and conducted by the Justice Policy Program within RAND Social and Economic Well-Being.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Tool series. RAND tools may include models, databases, calculators, computer code, GIS mapping tools, practitioner guidelines, web applications, and various toolkits. All RAND tools undergo rigorous peer review to ensure both high data standards and appropriate methodology in keeping with RAND's commitment to quality and objectivity.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.