Research Questions What percentages of ELA and mathematics teachers are using high-quality instructional materials? How does use of high-quality materials vary depending on teachers' subject area, their grade level, and whether they are in IMPD Network states?
In many states, college and career-ready standards for mathematics and English-language arts (ELA) are more rigorous than ever before. However, research suggests that teachers do not always have access to high-quality curricula that reflect key elements of states' college and career-ready standards. The RAND Corporation's American Teacher Panel (ATP) has asked a nationally-representative sample of public school teachers which instructional materials they use regularly for classroom instruction in mathematics and ELA. In this data note, we specifically consider the proportion of U.S. teachers reporting they used high-quality materials for mathematics and ELA instruction during the 2017–2018 school year. We also consider which factors were related to whether teachers reported using high-quality materials. These data also provide some baseline indication of high-quality curriculum use in the High-Quality Instructional Materials and Professional Development (IMPD) Network, a group of eight states working to encourage the adoption and use of high-quality materials in their states.
Key Findings Mathematics teachers were more likely to report regular use of at least one high-quality material compared to ELA teachers, although high school mathematics teachers were less likely than their elementary and middle school counterparts to report use of high-quality materials. More middle school ELA teachers reported use of high-quality materials than elementary and high school ELA teachers. Teachers in states participating in the High Quality Instructional Materials and Professional Development Network were more likely to use high-quality materials.
Recommendations Our results suggest a dearth of commonly used high-quality materials for high school ELA and mathematics, as well as for elementary ELA. Publishers and those advocating for use of high-quality materials could find ways to provide teachers with more of those materials; open-access online materials might get more high-quality materials into the hands of teachers. States may be able to make a difference in the materials that teachers use.
Related Products
Report
How Much Influence Do Teachers Have in Their Schools? It Depends on Whom You Ask Dec 13, 2018
William R. Johnston @WR_Johnston, Goke Akinniranye, et al.
Report
Report
AEP Data Note Technical Appendix Dec 13, 2018
Report
Are Educators Setting Goals for Social-Emotional Learning? Evidence from Nationally Representative Surveys Jan 17, 2019
Christopher Joseph Doss @Chris_J_Doss, William R. Johnston @WR_Johnston, et al.
Report
School Reform Efforts: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? Educator Perspectives on the Rapid Life Cycle of School Reforms Apr 11, 2019
Christopher Joseph Doss @Chris_J_Doss, Goke Akinniranye
Report
School Improvement Plans: Is There Room for Improvement? May 16, 2019
Christopher Joseph Doss @Chris_J_Doss, Goke Akinniranye, et al.
Report
Perceptions of School Leadership: Implications for Principal Effectiveness Mar 14, 2019
Katie Tosh, Christopher Joseph Doss @Chris_J_Doss
Report
Time for Change? Educators' Perceptions of Discipline Reform in Their Schools Jun 13, 2019
Rachel Perera, Courtney Armstrong
Report
Students with Unique Learning Profiles: Do Teachers Have Adequate Support? Jul 11, 2019
Tiffany Tsai, William R. Johnston @WR_Johnston
Report
Educator Access to and Use of Data Systems Feb 14, 2019
Tiffany Tsai, Katie Tosh
Report
Where Do Educators Turn to Address Instructional and Behavior Challenges? Aug 15, 2019
Laura S. Hamilton @HamiltonLauraS, Gerald Paul Hunter
Report
Report
AEP Data Note Technical Appendix 2 Aug 15, 2019
Research conducted by RAND Education and Labor
The research described in this report was conducted by RAND Education and Labor and supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. For this document, different permissions for re-use apply. Please refer to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation section on our permissions page.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.