Several banks have started receiving goods and services tax (GST) notices for using their brand name by their branches and subsidiaries, Mint reported on Friday, citing people aware of the matter.
This comes after a recent ruling by the Authority for Advanced Rulings (AAR) of Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, and Karnataka, saying that each entity in a bank with a different GST number will be considered a distinct entity for tax purposes.
According to the report, the tax authorities believe the brand name is a free service given to related parties and thus subject to GST. This has brought uncertainty in banks as their brand name is also used by their other businesses, like mutual funds and insurance, among other sectors.
Also Read: India's WPI inflation remains in deflation for fifth straight month in Aug
The experts cited in the report said that this poses two challenges to the banks. One, they will have to calculate the value of their brand name, which is a challenging task. Second, they are not eligible to claim a 100 per cent input tax credit (ITC) for it.
According to GST rules, banks and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) are eligible to claim only 50 per cent ITC against services and capital goods. If the use of the brand name is subject to GST, a bank can only claim half the GST as input credit.
For firms in most other sectors, GST laws allow 100 per cent ITC.
Also Read
I-T dept issues notices to 15 social media influencers over low tax payment
I-T Dept sends 8,000 notices to taxpayers who claimed exemption for charity
We walked the talk on value of new business: ICICI Pru Life CEO & MD Kannan
ICICI Pru Life gets GST demand notice for Rs 492 cr, firm to contest matter
GST spurts fiscal equality: tax-GSDP ratio higher in poorer states
Top headlines: Sitharaman says no licence raj, sees buoyancy in economy
India's vegetable oil imports up 33% to 1.86 mn tonne in Aug: SEA
Kerala's revenue collection in 2021-22 down 10% compared to 2017-18: CAG
Pulses prices stabilise as rains revive over major growing states
India's outward FDI down 33.3% in August on grim global prospects
"In the case of banks, where the logo or brand is used by their group companies, it is an interpretative issue, whether this constitutes a supply or is an inherent function of the holding company. To avoid litigation, it is recommended that a clarification is issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs," Saurabh Agrawal, tax partner, EY was quoted as saying in the report.
Also Read: Fitch retains India's growth forecast at 6.3%, flags inflation risks