SINGAPORE - A Bangladeshi machine operator, accused of causing a colleague to be crushed to death, had planned to plead guilty, but two pro bono lawyers got him acquitted in January.
A court date had been set for Sept 1, 2023, for Mr Uttom, 44, who goes by one name, to plead guilty to one charge of performing a negligent act which endangered the safety of workers.
He had been accused of causing the death of Mr Karuppaiah Selvaraj on Feb 24, 2020, at 11 Shipyard Crescent off Pioneer Road after pressing a button, causing a door to close on him. Mr Karuppaiah was pinned by the door and pronounced dead at the scene by a paramedic.
Mr Uttom approached the Migrant Workers Legal Clinic in October, as he did not understand the charge he was facing.
In November, Mr Yip Jian Yang and Ms Tan Su, lawyers from Pro Bono SG’s Criminal Legal Aid Scheme, were assigned to Mr Uttom’s case.
Speaking to The Sunday Times on Jan 26, Ms Tan said: “When we came on board, Mr Uttom told us he did not quite understand what had happened during the previous court hearings. He even indicated to the court that he would plead guilty, despite being confused by the charge he was facing.”
The lawyers said Mr Uttom was previously accused of pressing a button on a shear machine’s mobile panel, causing its door to close while the workers were carrying out maintenance work. The shear machine was used to cut scrap metal.
Catch up on the news that everyone’s talking about
Thank you!
Sign up
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and T&Cs.
Mr Yip said: “Mr Uttom explained to us through a translator that he was instructed to press the button to raise the shear, which he did. However, it resulted in the door closing, as the two parts were operating in tandem.”
Mr Yip and Ms Tan met Ministry of Manpower (MOM) prosecutors in December in a confidential meeting to discuss the charge.
About a week later, the lawyers were told Mr Uttom would be given a discharge amounting to an acquittal, meaning he cannot be charged with the same offence again.
Ms Tan said: “When I called him to tell him the good news, I could hear the relief in his voice. It was like a weight had been lifted off his shoulders, especially since this case had been constantly on his mind since 2020.”
MOM’s investigations revealed that Kim Hock Corp, a company that processes scrap metal for export, had failed to implement adequate safe work procedures to control the risks posed to employees when performing maintenance works on the machine. The company had not ensured that all employees performing maintenance works on the machine were provided with proper training and instruction beforehand.
Kim Hock Corp was fined $240,000 over Mr Karuppaiah’s death.
While Mr Uttom’s case was before the courts, he continued working for the company.
Mr Yip said: “In cases like Mr Uttom’s, the fear of being in a foreign country and not understanding the language everyone else is speaking can really cause them to feel lost when faced with criminal proceedings.
“I’m glad there’s an avenue for migrant workers to get legal guidance and representation, and I’m thankful we’re making a difference in this way.”
Jobless man who cycled 5 hours to see lawyer a reminder that everyone deserves legal help
Compelled to help because maid came to S’pore to make a living, not be abused
Unlock unlimited access to ST exclusive content, insights and analyses
ST One Digital - Annual
$9.90 $4.95 /month
Get offer
$59.40 for the first year and $118.80 per year thereafter.
ST One Digital - Monthly
29.90 $9.90 /month
Subscribe today
No lock-in contract
Unlock more knowledge, unlock more benefits
New feature: Stay up to date on important topics and follow your favourite writers with myST All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com Easy access any time via ST app on one mobile device
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Singapore courts Lawyers Crime
Facebook Telegram More Whatsapp Linkedin Twitter FB Messenger Email Print Purchase Article Copy permalink https://str.sg/7nZD
Read this subscriber-only article for free!
Just sign up for a free account and log in to continue reading.
Pro bono cases: Ensuring worker did not plead guilty just because he didn’t understand the charge
Sign up
Already have an account? Log in.
All done! This article is now fully available for you
Pro bono cases: Ensuring worker did not plead guilty just because he didn’t understand the charge
Read now
Please verify your e-mail to read this subscriber-only article in full
Pro bono cases: Ensuring worker did not plead guilty just because he didn’t understand the charge
Resend verification e-mail
The gift link for this subscriber-only article has expired.
Get unlimited access to all stories at $0.99/month for the first 3 months.
Subscribe now
You have reached your limit of subscriber-only articles this month.
Get unlimited access to all stories at $0.99/month for the first 3 months.
Subscribe now
Read and win!
Read 3 articles and stand to win rewards
Let's go! Terms & conditions apply
Frequently asked questions
Good job, you've read 3 articles today!
Spin the wheel now
Let's go! Terms & conditions apply
Frequently asked questions