用户名/邮箱
登录密码
验证码
看不清?换一张
您好,欢迎访问! [ 登录 | 注册 ]
您的位置:首页 - 最新资讯
Opinion The unequal representation in the Senate
2023-12-11 00:00:00.0     华盛顿邮报-华盛顿特区     原网页

       

       Share

       Comment on this story Comment

       Add to your saved stories

       Save

       Regarding the Dec. 1 front-page article “The hidden biases at play in the U.S. Senate”:

       There are many questions about whether the United States is as true a democracy as it is meant to be.

       Wp Get the full experience.Choose your plan ArrowRight

       When, time after time, the majority of Americans tell the government they want more gun control for their protection, or assurance of the rights for women to decide their own health care, it should provide those things in the law. Minorities can do all they want to dissuade the majority, but majority say should rule. The Senate and the House have failed to deliver on the majority will of the people with regard to these issues, and many others, because of the improper influence of the minority.

       Story continues below advertisement

       An even more glaring failure in our democracy is the fact that so many elections for president have been decided not by majority opinion (the popular vote) but by a contrived and unnecessary electoral college that in no way represents the will of the people. Again, it is up to the minority party to convince the majority of voters that its candidate is best for the country. It should not deliberately suppress the rights of some to vote or skew voting districts to gain power over the majority, and in the end win in the electoral college.

       Advertisement

       The electoral college is an anachronism that should be abandoned for a truer democracy to exist. The United States fancies itself a model democracy. It needs to get its act together and demonstrate that the will of the people is not only heard but also provided by its government.

       Jared Wermiel, Silver Spring

       Story continues below advertisement

       The Dec. 1 front-page article on the Senate pointed out that the U.S. population is not represented equitably in our Senate. That fits our Founders’ intent, which was to form a nation out of the 13 independent states. Those states are represented in the Senate, just as countries are represented in the United Nations, without regard to population in either case.

       In those days, “U.S.” was a plural noun. Back then, one said that the United States are located on the Eastern Seaboard. That changed with the Civil War; thereafter, one said that the United States is located on the Eastern Seaboard. The change reflects the idea that our states are not independent entities that can secede at will, as did the Confederate states.

       Advertisement

       The Founders had a different conception of our country than we do. Today, we think of the people, rather than the states, as its foundation. That’s why it is so dangerous to insist that we rely on the Founders’ attitudes to solve today’s problems.

       Story continues below advertisement

       Stephen Lane, Bethesda

       Share this article Share

       The Post will undoubtedly be accused of applying critical race theory to its analysis of the composition of the Senate. The Constitution was formed to protect slavery, and vestiges of the deals struck long ago haunt us today. The structure of the Senate was also incorporated in allocation of votes in the electoral college, giving voters in small states more weight in the election of presidents.

       Minority rule in the confirmation of conservative justices to the Supreme Court was also manifested in the denial of a vote on the nomination of Merrick Garland. And, as the article sadly made plain, the bias in favor of White people manifested in the Constitution when adopted continues.

       Advertisement

       Story continues below advertisement

       The wrong in all this is obvious. The remedy is not. The biases in our structure of governance are also present in the process prescribed for amendment of the Constitution. And so, the inequities so aptly described in the referenced piece will grow and fester. Until what?

       Pat Fleming, Washington

       The Dec. 1 article on hidden biases in the Senate said, in describing the expansion of voting in America, that today “the franchise [is] open to adult citizens, regardless of race or landowning status.” Not true; if you own land in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico or the territories, you are automatically disenfranchised and have no representation in the U.S. Senate by virtue of your residency or “landowner status.” That fact should never be overlooked.

       Michael D. Brown, Washington

       The writer, a Democrat, is a shadow senator for D.C.

       Share

       24 Comments

       More letters to the editor

       HAND CURATED

       Opinion | It’s okay to put the Jeep Cherokee fight to rest

       Earlier today

       Opinion | It’s okay to put the Jeep Cherokee fight to rest

       Earlier today

       Opinion | A wall is not the right strategy to fix the border problem

       Earlier today

       Opinion | A wall is not the right strategy to fix the border problem

       Earlier today

       Opinion | The fight for Ukraine aid in the U.S. Senate

       Earlier today

       Opinion | The fight for Ukraine aid in the U.S. Senate

       Earlier today

       View 3 more stories

       Loading...

       Subscribe to comment and get the full experience. Choose your plan →

       


标签:综合
关键词: Comment     Senate     Opinion     biases     advertisement     continues     majority     Founders     democracy     article    
滚动新闻