Bolivia’s recent interim government came to power by sidestepping constitutional rules for presidential succession and persecuted opponents with “systematic torture” and “summary executions” by security forces in the tumultuous aftermath of Evo Morales’ resignation in 2019, according to a new report by independent human rights experts.

       The scathing, 471-page report is the most comprehensive yet to examine the events surrounding the disputed 2019 presidential vote, when Morales’ narrow election to an unprecedented fourth term triggered widespread protests spurred by strong international allegations of voting fraud — claims later questioned by foreign electoral experts.

       The report, presented Tuesday in La Paz in an event attended by new President Luis Arce, was commissioned by the Organization of American States chief human rights watchdog under an agreement with the former interim government led by Jeanine á？ez.

       The five-member panel’s findings of widespread abuses by security forces acting under the conservative interim government’s direction is likely to embolden leftist supporters of Morales and Arce, who have long maintained á？ez took power through a coup tacitly backed by the Trump administration. It’s also likely to undercut criticism by the Biden administration and others suggesting that the jailing of á？ez on sedition and terrorism charges tied to the unrest was politically motivated.

       “This thoroughly documented report sets the record straight,” said Kathryn Ledebur, who leads the nonprofit Andean Information Network in Bolivia and has been a sharp critic of á？ez.

       Recommended ‘We’ve seen what they’ve done before’: Biden adviser Jake Sullivan says ‘heart goes out’ to Afghan women and girls Bipartisan group of senators calls for special fast-track visa category for Afghan women leaders Biden news – live: White House calls Afghanistan videos ‘heartbreaking’ as president’s approval rating drops

       Ledebur, an American who has lived in Bolivia for decades, said she finds U.S. policy toward Bolivia especially disappointing because of the parallels between how the á？ez government spread misinformation and intervened in the judiciary to attack opponents and attempts by former President Donald Trump to hold onto power following his defeat last year.

       “Instead of suggesting á？ez’s arrest was politically motivated, the U.S. should speak out about the gross human rights violations committed by, and the illegality of, the á？ez government,” Ledebur said.

       The State Department said that it would not comment until it had heard from the Group of Independent Experts and had reviewed its report. But a spokesperson in an email said that Bolivians deserve accountability based on credible legal proceedings that respect due process.

       Following á？ez’s arrest in March, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Twitter that he was “deeply concerned by growing signs of antidemocratic behavior and politicization” of Bolivia’s justice system.

       An OAS electoral mission to Bolivia found a number of “irregularities” in the 2019 election, including the existence of hidden computer servers. Morales officially won by barely enough votes to avoid a runoff with the second-place finisher.

       That OAS electoral mission’s findings prompted opponents joined by Bolivia’s armed forces to pressure Morales into resigning hours after he had acquiesced to OAS Secretary General Luis Almagro’s call for a redo of the vote.

       Later, researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology would cast doubt on the OAS’ claim that a sudden change in voting trends following an extended lapse in releasing results pointed to fraud. The OAS has stood by its findings.

       The new report, which was the result of eight months of research partly funded by the U.S. Government and the Ford Foundation, is careful not to endorse claims of a coup against Morales.

       But it does question the legitimacy of á？ez’s ascent to power, pointing out that her election to the head of the Senate and then as interim president lacked the quorum required by Bolivia’s constitution after several of Morales’ allies in the legislature resigned in protest.

       “If this isn’t a coup, what more proof can there be?” Arce said at Tuesday’s presentation to shouts of “Justice!” by relatives of those killed?) who were also in attendance.

       The report also detailed examples of excessive force by police, including the use of lethal ammunition, to suppress unarmed supporters of Morales who poured into the streets. At least 20 people were killed in two incidents the experts characterized as “massacres” perpetrated by security forces acting under the authority of a decree signed by á？ez guaranteeing amnesty for those working to reestablish public order.

       “We don’t want revenge. We want justice,” said Georgina Siles, whose son Omar was killed after being shot in back in the city Sacaba.

       The report highlights the deep political polarization surrounding Morales’ changing of the constitution to seek a fourth term, deep-seated racism against his Indigenous followers and traditionally weak institutions as aggravating factors.

       But it specifically faults á？ez officials for utilizing the judiciary and security forces to target opponents, often based on flimsy evidence. It also found evidence of female detainees being threatened with rape and subjected to genital touching.

       Among those imprisoned was a maid found when police raided the abandoned home of a former top official, as well as Morales’ former cabinet chief, Patricia Hermosa, who had a miscarriage in custody while being denied medical attention, according to the report.

       The report contains 36 recommendations, including calls to compensate victims of state violence, a thorough investigation of crimes committed by security forces and greater independence for prosecutors and judges.

       Recommended NYC congresswoman who wore burqa in 2001 speech tells of ‘heartbreak’ over Afghanistan US freezes billions in Afghanistan assets as it blocks Taliban from seizing country’s wealth ‘95% of Americans would support Biden speech’: How US reacted to president’s Afghanistan address that Brits said was ‘devoid of empathy’

       ___

       Goodman reported from Cleveland, Ohio