Listen 4 min

       Share

       Comment on this story Comment

       Add to your saved stories

       Save

       NEW YORK — A New York appellate court Monday told lawyers for Donald Trump that they missed a deadline to seek permission from a panel of judges to quickly consider a request to file a higher court challenge to a gag order against Trump in connection with a $250 million civil fraud case.

       Keeping up with politics is easy with The 5-Minute Fix Newsletter, in your inbox weekdays. ArrowRight

       Trump lawyers sought prompt permission from the appellate court to ask the Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, to pause a gag order against the former president issued by New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron, who is presiding over the fraud trial.

       Trump is scheduled to testify for the defense on Monday and is expected to be the final defense witness called in the fraud case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. He previously testified in the trial when called to do so by state lawyers.

       Advertisement

       Story continues below advertisement

       Engoron issued the gag order Oct. 3 to prevent Trump from commenting on court staff after he deemed Trump’s references to a law clerk problematic because they generated an overwhelming number of threats and harassing messages. There has been a barrage of calls to the clerk’s personal cellphone and a flood of alarming messages to her email accounts.

       Trump has twice been found in violation of the order and has been fined a total of $15,000.

       Subscribe to The Trump Trials, our weekly email newsletter on Donald Trump’s four criminal cases

       Trump’s lawyers say he will be irrevocably harmed by the gag order lasting through the end of testimony. His lawyers were barred from publicly discussing the law clerk’s frequent interactions with Engoron, which they have argued is evidence that the clerk, who has been active in local Democratic politics, is biased and too involved in decisions.

       Judge issues gag order in fraud case after Trump assails staffer on social media

       “Without expedited review, [Trump and the defense team] will continue to suffer irreparable injury daily, as they are silenced on matters implicating the appearance of bias and impropriety on the bench during a trial of immense stakes,” Trump attorney Clifford Robert argued in a court filing Monday.

       Advertisement

       Story continues below advertisement

       During an informal session in the clerk’s office at the appellate court Monday, Robert and Christopher Kise, another of Trump’s lawyers, argued for a single judge to grant permission to advance their appeal, but they were told that was not proper procedure because a full panel must decide the issue.

       Share this article Share

       An attorney for the court, Lauren Holmes, told the lawyers that they missed a Monday morning filing deadline to potentially have a full panel consider the request this week.

       James’s office has said the gag order is more than fair as a measure to protect the court staff’s safety and is limited in scope.

       Defense lawyers maintain that the gag order is a constitutional rights violation for Trump, who is the Republican front-runner in the 2024 presidential race.

       What to know about Donald Trump’s gag orders in D.C. and New York

       Engoron has prohibited Trump from speaking about the law clerk and anyone else on his staff, but Trump is free to make disparaging comments about the judge and James, which he often has.

       Advertisement

       Story continues below advertisement

       Last week, an appeals court panel reimposed the gag order following a two-week pause after a single judge imposed a temporary stay. During those two weeks, Trump made social media comments about the law clerk, and Trump followers responded with antisemitic and other hateful messages.

       Trump also has a gag order in his D.C. federal criminal case for allegedly trying to obstruct the results of the 2020 presidential election. He faces four criminal indictments and the possibility of multiple serious trials next year, as he seeks reelection.

       The civil fraud case stems from a lawsuit filed by James against Trump, his two adult sons, two other executives and his namesake business last year, alleging a years-long fraud that involved falsely inflating the values of assets on financial documents to get better terms from lenders and insurance firms.

       The Trumps and their lawyers have denied any wrongdoing.

       Share

       1228 Comments

       Loading...

       Subscribe to comment and get the full experience. Choose your plan →