Koo Yeon-kyung, left, the eldest daughter of the LG chairman who died in 2018, with her mother, Kim Young-shik, and sister, Koo Yeon-sue, right. Credit...Chang W. Lee/The New York Times
Family Split at LG, a South Korean Giant, Tests Corporate Succession
A lawsuit pitted the former chairman’s widow and daughters against the son he adopted, challenging the patriarchal traditions of a $10 billion conglomerate.
Koo Yeon-kyung, left, the eldest daughter of the LG chairman who died in 2018, with her mother, Kim Young-shik, and sister, Koo Yeon-sue, right.Credit...Chang W. Lee/The New York Times
Supported by
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Share full article
33
Read in app
By Daisuke Wakabayashi and Victoria Kim
Reporting from Seoul
Dec. 18, 2023Updated 10:58 a.m. ET
When Koo Bon-moo, chairman of South Korean conglomerate LG, died in 2018, there wasn’t much question, at least publicly, of who would next preside over the company.
LG, a $10 billion corporate empire, is governed by the principle of male primogeniture. Succession was effectively settled 14 years earlier when Mr. Koo and his wife adopted their eldest nephew, Koo Kwang-mo. The adoption was necessitated by tragedy and tradition after the couple’s teenage son died in 1994, and their efforts for another male heir resulted in a second daughter.
The Koo family has controlled LG since it was founded in 1947, and the transition that elevated Kwang-mo to the helm seemed seamless, burnishing the family’s reputation for harmony.
Subscribe to The Times to read as many articles as you like.
Daisuke Wakabayashi is an Asia business correspondent for The Times based in Seoul, covering economic, corporate and geopolitical stories from the region. More about Daisuke Wakabayashi
Victoria Kim is a correspondent based in Seoul, focused on international breaking news coverage. More about Victoria Kim
Read 33 Comments
Share full article
33
Read in app
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Comments 33 Family Split at LG, a South Korean Giant, Tests Corporate Succession Skip to Comments Share your thoughts. The Times needs your voice. We welcome your on-topic commentary, criticism and expertise. Comments are moderated for civility.