SINGAPORE – The High Court has dismissed bids by two King’s Counsel, one from Australia and the other from Britain, to be admitted to the Singapore Bar on an ad hoc basis so that they can act for four convicted drug traffickers on death row.
In a written judgment on Jan 30, Justice Woo Bih Li said there were no special reasons to grant the applications for ad hoc admission.
Mr Theodoros Kassimatis and Mr Edward Fitzgerald had filed separate applications in 2023, each seeking to act for two inmates.
Mr Kassimatis was admitted as a barrister and solicitor of the Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia, in 2001. He was appointed Senior Counsel in November 2016 and Queen’s Counsel in March 2017.
He had sought admission to act for Jumaat Mohamed Sayed and Saminathan Selvaraju.
Mr Fitzgerald was called to the Bar of England and Wales in November 1978. He was appointed Queen’s Counsel in January 1995.
He had sought admission to act for Datchinamurthy Kataiah and Lingkesvaran Rajendaren.
Catch up on the news that everyone’s talking about
Thank you!
Sign up
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and T&Cs.
The four inmates were convicted of heroin trafficking and given the mandatory death penalty between 2015 and 2018. Their respective appeals against conviction were dismissed between 2016 and 2020.
On Aug 22, 2022, they applied for permission to start a constitutional challenge against provisions of the Misuse of Drugs Act that shift the burden of proof for specific elements of the offence to the accused person.
They argued that these provisions violate the presumption of innocence that is protected under the Constitution.
The bid was dismissed by the High Court on Nov 25, 2022. One of the judge’s reasons was that the subject matter of their application was not susceptible to judicial review.
The four then filed further applications in an attempt to appeal against the High Court’s decision.
Mr Kassimatis and Mr Fitzgerald subsequently applied for ad hoc admission to act for the four.
The two King’s Counsel filed written submissions and made oral submissions before Justice Woo through Datchinamurthy on Nov 23, 2023.
Death row inmates must get Court of Appeal’s permission before filing post-appeal applications
New process proposed for death row inmates to file challenges after legal avenues exhausted
Under the Legal Profession Act, foreign counsel seeking ad hoc admission must first meet certain requirements before the court considers whether there is a special reason to admit them.
One of the mandatory requirements states that the individual must have special qualifications or experience for the purpose of the case.
In the present case, Justice Woo found that Mr Fitzgerald has special experience in cases involving judicial review, but Mr Kassimatis did not meet this requirement.
As for whether there were special reasons, Justice Woo said the mere fact that the case raised issues of public importance was not sufficient to admit the two foreign lawyers.
The inmates had argued that a special reason exists as they have been unable to find local lawyers to represent them.
Justice Woo said the reasons for the unsuccessful efforts to engage local counsel were relevant.
The judge highlighted that the inmates’ friends had approached two local lawyers, who stated that “the facts of the four cases are such that the pending challenge has no merit”.
Justice Woo said it would be incongruous to allow foreign lawyers to be admitted when local counsel are of the view that there is no merit on the facts.
The judge added that the four inmates have been able to access substantive legal assistance, even without formal representation.
He noted that a Malaysian lawyer had prepared some documents for them, and that the written submissions they filed were drafted with legal terms and arguments.
Justice Woo said there was nothing to prevent foreign counsel from taking part in the preparation of the written submissions.
S'pore Prison Service rebuts claim by death row inmate's sister that filing of court application was blocked
Man on death row over heroin deal gets 10 years’ jail after appeal
Unlock unlimited access to ST exclusive content, insights and analyses
ST One Digital - Annual
$9.90 $4.95 /month
Get offer
$59.40 for the first year and $118.80 per year thereafter.
ST One Digital - Monthly
29.90 $9.90 /month
Subscribe today
No lock-in contract
Unlock more knowledge, unlock more benefits
New feature: Stay up to date on important topics and follow your favourite writers with myST All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com Easy access any time via ST app on one mobile device
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Lawyers Death penalty/Capital punishment Singapore courts
Facebook Telegram More Whatsapp Linkedin Twitter FB Messenger Email Print Purchase Article Copy permalink https://str.sg/qwMF
Read this subscriber-only article for free!
Just sign up for a free account and log in to continue reading.
High Court rejects bids by two King’s Counsel to act for 4 drug traffickers on death row
Sign up
Already have an account? Log in.
All done! This article is now fully available for you
High Court rejects bids by two King’s Counsel to act for 4 drug traffickers on death row
Read now
Please verify your e-mail to read this subscriber-only article in full
High Court rejects bids by two King’s Counsel to act for 4 drug traffickers on death row
Resend verification e-mail
The gift link for this subscriber-only article has expired.
Get unlimited access to all stories at $0.99/month for the first 3 months.
Subscribe now
You have reached your limit of subscriber-only articles this month.
Get unlimited access to all stories at $0.99/month for the first 3 months.
Subscribe now
Read and win!
Read 3 articles and stand to win rewards
Let's go! Terms & conditions apply
Frequently asked questions
Good job, you've read 3 articles today!
Spin the wheel now
Let's go! Terms & conditions apply
Frequently asked questions