Get the free Morning Headlines email for news from our reporters across the world Sign up to our free Morning Headlines email

       Please enter a valid email address

       Please enter a valid email address

       SIGN UP

       I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy notice

       Thanks for signing up to the

       Morning Headlines email

       {{ #verifyErrors }} {{ message }} {{ /verifyErrors }} {{ ^verifyErrors }} Something went wrong. Please try again later {{ /verifyErrors }}

       The Duke of Sussex has lost his High Court challenge against the government over its decision to reduce his publicly-funded protection when he is in the UK.

       Prince Harry’s lawyers had argued he was being “singled out” and treated “less favourably” in the decision by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) in 2020.

       The decision was made in the same year Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, decided to “step back as senior members of the royal family’ as they bid to become financially independent.

       However, a ruling by retired High Court judge Sir Peter Lane on 28 February rejected Prince Harry’s case, concluding that Ravec’s approach was not irrational nor procedurally unfair.

       The duke has since said he will appeal.

       It is one of a series of recent High Court cases brought forward by the prince. Last year, he won a case against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) over a phone hacking claiming. And in January, the duke decided to withdraw libel action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL).

       Here we take a look at the legal cases the duke has been involved in recently:

       Recommended Prince Harry loses legal challenge against Home Office over security arrangements With an embattled royal family, could Prince Harry return as the half-in, half-out Windsor? Prince Harry and Meghan reflect on their ‘meaningful’ visit to Canada

       Privacy claim against Splash News and Picture Agency

       In May 2019, Harry accepted substantial damages and an apology from a news agency that took pictures of his home in the Cotswolds from a helicopter.

       Harry settled privacy and data protection claims against Splash News and Picture Agency over photographs “of and into the living area and dining area of the home and directly into the bedroom”.

       The court heard Splash agreed to pay damages and legal costs.

       Legal action against the Home Office

       The duke brought legal action against the Home Office over the security arrangements for himself and his family when they are in the UK.

       He challenged the February 2020 decision of the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) – which falls under the remit of the Home Office – over his security, after being told he would no longer be given the “same degree” of personal protective security when visiting.

       The duke’s legal team argued that the security arrangements set out in a letter from Ravec, and their application when he visited the UK in June 2021, were invalid due to “procedural unfairness”, and there will be a full High Court hearing to review the duke’s claim.

       However, retired High Court judge Sir Peter Lane rejected the duke’s case, concluding that Ravec’s approach was not irrational nor procedurally unfair.

       In his 52-page partially redacted ruling issued on 28 February this year, he said the prince’s lawyers had taken “an inappropriate, formalist interpretation of the Ravec process”.

       “The ‘bespoke’ process devised for the claimant in the decision of 28 February 2020 was, and is, legally sound,” he added.

       The duke has since said he will appeal against the ruling.

       Libel claim against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL)

       The duke brought a libel claim against ANL – the publisher of the Daily Mail and The Mail On Sunday – over an article about his case against the Home Office.

       The story was published online and in the newspaper in February 2022 under the headline: “Exclusive: How Prince Harry tried to keep his legal fight with the government over police bodyguards a secret… then – just minutes after the story broke – his PR machine tried to put a positive spin on the dispute”.

       Justin Rushbrooke KC, for Harry, had said the Mail On Sunday article “purported to reveal, in sensational terms” that information from court documents filed by the duke “contradicted public statements he had previously made about his willingness to pay for police protection for himself and his family whilst in the UK”.

       ANL contested the claim, arguing the article expressed an “honest opinion” and did not cause “serious harm” to his reputation.

       The civil claim had been heading towards an estimated three-day trial scheduled for May this year, but in January this year, the duke decided to withdraw the libel claim.

       Alleged unlawful information gathering at Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL)

       Prince Harry is one of seven people, also including David Furnish, Sadie Frost, Liz Hurley and Sir Simon Hughes, who have brought legal action against ANL over denied allegations it carried out or commissioned unlawful information gathering.

       The allegations include hiring private investigators to place listening devices inside cars, “blagging” private records and accessing and recording private phone conversations.

       ANL, which “firmly” denies the allegations, asked a judge to rule in its favour without a trial, arguing the legal challenges against it were brought “far too late”.

       A hearing is expected this year.

       Alleged unlawful information gathering at Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN)

       The Duke of Sussex and others sued Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) over alleged unlawful information gathering are waiting to find out whether they will win their case.

       The prince brought the case against MGN for damages, claiming journalists at its titles – the Daily and Sunday Mirror and Sunday People – were linked to methods including phone hacking, so-called “blagging” or gaining information by deception, and use of private investigators for unlawful activities.

       His case was heard alongside similar claims by actor Michael Turner, who is known professionally as Michael Le Vell and best known for playing Kevin Webster in Coronation Street, actress Nikki Sanderson and comedian Paul Whitehouse’s ex-wife Fiona Wightman.

       The allegations covered a period from as early as 1991 until at least 2011, the court was told. Harry faced eight hours of questioning over two days during a witness box appearance that drew the attention of the world’s media.

       On 15 December 2023, High Court judge Mr Justice Fancourt ruled “extensive” phone hacking had taken place at MGN. He also said there had been so-called “blagging” or gaining information by deception, and use of private investigators for unlawful activities.

       Prince Harry was awarded ￡140,600 in damages over 15 of the 33 MGN articles he complained about. A further 115 articles were in the duke’s claim, which could have been subject to a further trial.

       But on 9 February this year, it was confirmed that a settlement had been reached with MGN over the remaining parts of the claim. This included an interim payment towards costs of ￡400,000, the prince’s barrister said.

       Alleged unlawful information gathering at News Group Newspapers (NGN)

       Harry is suing News Group Newspapers (NGN), publisher of The Sun and the now-defunct News Of The World, over alleged unlawful information gathering. The duke alleged he was targeted by journalists and private investigators working for the papers.

       At a hearing in April 2023, NGN asked Mr Justice Fancourt to throw out the duke’s case, arguing it was brought too late because he should have known sooner he had a potential claim.

       In a ruling in July 2023, the judge concluded that Harry cannot bring his claim relating to phone hacking, but that his claim over other allegations – including use of private investigators – could go ahead to a trial.

       A spokesperson for NGN said after the ruling that the judge had “dismissed” the duke’s phone hacking claims against its two titles in a “significant victory” for the publisher, adding that the judgment “substantially reduces the scope of his legal claim”.

       A trial is expected to take place later in 2024.

       More about Mirror Group Newspapers Daily Mail The Sun Prince Harry Phone Hacking duke of sussex News Group Newspapers

       1/ 1All the legal claims Prince Harry has been involved in

       All the legal claims Prince Harry has been involved in The repression of male sadness and anger has been connected to the harrowing statistics around male suicide – the biggest killer for under-45s

       ？ Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article

       Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.

       Subscribe

       Already subscribed? Log in