GEIS-新闻详情

Lim Tean to testify as disciplinary tribunal hears case again over $30,000 cheque

2024-04-01 00:00:00.0 海峡时报-新加坡原网页

SINGAPORE – A disciplinary tribunal will re-hear the case against lawyer and opposition politician Lim Tean, after he told the Court of Three Judges on April 1 that he will now take the stand to testify in his defence.

In 2023, the tribunal, appointed by the Chief Justice in 2021, found Lim guilty of two charges of grossly improper conduct in relation to a $30,000 cheque that he encashed despite being notified that he had been discharged from acting for the client.

The tribunal found that the case was serious enough for it to be referred to the court – the highest disciplinary body for the legal profession – which can suspend lawyers or strike them off the rolls.

As Lim faced the court on April 1, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon noted the unusual circumstances of the case – the tribunal had decided the case based on documents, because neither Lim nor his former client gave oral evidence.

This meant there were gaps in the factual narrative, said the Chief Justice.

The counsel for the Law Society of Singapore, Mr Chenthil Kumarasingam, explained that after lodging a complaint against Lim, the client, Mr Suresh Kumar A. Jesupal, did not want further involvement in the matter.

Lim explained that a few days before the disciplinary hearing, he was charged with criminal breach of trust (CBT) in respect of the same sum of money.

Catch up on the news that everyone’s talking about

Thank you!

By signing up, I accept SPH Media's Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy as amended from time to time.

Yes, I would also like to receive SPH Media Group's SPH Media Limited, its related corporations and affiliates as well as their agents and authorised service providers.

marketing and promotions.

He said he took the advice of his counsel that he should not give evidence at the disciplinary hearing, particularly since Mr Suresh Kumar did not turn up.

The concern was that the evidence may be used against him in the criminal case, he said.

Lim said he has now decided to give evidence before the tribunal because of the “changed circumstances”.

He noted that the CBT charge was the most serious out of the seven criminal charges he faces, but the prosecution chose instead to proceed on the less serious charges of acting as a lawyer without a valid practising certificate.

He added that he did not know what the prosecution intends to do with the CBT charge.

After hearing Lim’s explanation, the Chief Justice said it was reasonable for him to take legal advice not to take the stand, especially when the complainant was not giving evidence.

The court, which also comprised Justices Tay Yong Kwang and Andrew Phang, set aside the tribunal’s findings and sent the case back to the tribunal to hear testimony from Lim and any witnesses he wishes to call.

Lim’s testimony will cover the issues of whether he knew that his retainer had been effectively terminated and whether he had an agreement with Mr Suresh Kumar over the payment of the $30,000.