The appellate court dismissed the subsequent appeal for the same reason. The petitioner then invoked the High Court’s revisional jurisdiction, arguing that the two orders were illegal and contrary to natural justice.In his detailed judgment, Justice Kazmi held that courts have a “ proactive and protective role ” when a minor is unable to consent....
He noted that even parental agreement can be overridden if it risks emotional or psychological harm.“ Even where both parents consent, the court mu
综合
黎明报-最新
2025-07-06 00:00:00.0